https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/8856

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/8856

The court found that Nandi/Kamobo/7441 was plainly a misdescription because the primary documents and title documents consistently identified the parcel as Nandi/Kamobo/7341. However, the applicant produced no supporting evidence for the proposed correction to the Kericho parcel, so only the first correction was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 8856 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner / Applicant: Dollyphyl Chepkwisich Tuindo; Petitioner / Applicant: Stephanie Chebet Kitur; Estate: Estate of Simon Kiptonui Kitur (Deceased)
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Probate & Administration E010 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Probate and Administration; Application for Rectification of Grant / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Certificate of Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
Application allowed in part
Judges
["OA Sewe"]
Legal Topics
Rectification of Grant, Correction of Misdescribed Estate Property, Certificate of Confirmation of Grant, Inherent Powers of the Court, Costs in Succession Proceedings
Source Language
en
Succession Law Probate and Administration Rectification of Grant Correction of Misdescribed Estate Property Certificate of Confirmation of Grant Inherent Powers of the Court Costs in Succession Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dollyphyl Chepkwisich Tuindo

Petitioner / Applicant

Stephanie Chebet Kitur

Petitioner / Applicant

Estate of Simon Kiptonui Kitur (Deceased)

Estate

Procedural Posture

Probate and Administration; Application for Rectification of Grant / Ruling on Summons for Rectification of Certificate of Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the court should rectify the Certificate of Confirmation of Grant to correct the parcel number Nandi/Kamobo/7441 to Nandi/Kamobo/7341
  2. 2 Whether there was sufficient evidence to justify the proposed correction from Kericho/Chilchila/Fort Ternan Block 5 (Siret)/347 to Kericho/Chilchillla/Fort Ternan Block 5 (Siret)/362
  3. 3 What order should be made as to costs

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Nandi/Kamobo/7441 was plainly a misdescription because the primary documents and title documents consistently identified the parcel as Nandi/Kamobo/7341. However, the applicant produced no supporting evidence for the proposed correction to the Kericho parcel, so only the first correction was allowed and the second was declined.

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part

Orders

  • The estate property reflected in the Certificate of Confirmation as Nandi/Kamobo/7441 is rectified to read Nandi/Kamobo/7341.
  • Prayer (b) seeking correction of Kericho/Chilchila/Fort Ternan Block 5 (Siret)/347 to Kericho/Chilchillla/Fort Ternan Block 5 (Siret)/362 is declined for want of justification.