[2014] KEHC 7094 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner had established sufficient grounds for the dissolution of the marriage under Section 8 of the Matrimonial Causes Act. The evidence showed that the parties had lived separately for six years, occupied separate bedrooms for 28 years, and only remained together for the sake of their...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 7094 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: A A R; Respondent: R R R
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 24 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition for divorce allowed; decree nisi issued; no order as to costs
- Judges
- JV Juma
- Legal Topics
- Dissolution of Marriage, Matrimonial Offences, Decree Nisi, Separation, Matrimonial Causes Act
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A A R
Petitioner
R R R
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage between the petitioner and respondent should be dissolved on grounds recognized under the Matrimonial Causes Act.
- 2 Whether the petitioner has established sufficient grounds for divorce in the absence of a response from the respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner had established sufficient grounds for the dissolution of the marriage under Section 8 of the Matrimonial Causes Act. The evidence showed that the parties had lived separately for six years, occupied separate bedrooms for 28 years, and only remained together for the sake of their child, who is now an adult. The respondent's failure to respond or contest the petition further indicated her lack of interest in maintaining the marriage. The court concluded that the marriage had broken down irretrievably and that it would serve no useful purpose to compel the parties to remain married. Accordingly, the petition for divorce was allowed, and a decree nisi was...
Court Disposition
petition for divorce allowed; decree nisi issued; no order as to costs
Orders
- The marriage between the petitioner and respondent is dissolved.
- A decree nisi to issue, to be made absolute within three months of the judgment date.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA
DIVORCE CAUSE NO. 24 OF 2013
A A R …..………..….…… PETITIONER
VERSUS
RR R .………………….… RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
By this petition dated 18th April 2013 filed in court on 2nd May 2013 the Petitioner A A Rseeks the following prayers:
“(a) THAT the marriage between your petitioner and the Respondent be dissolved and a Decree Nisi be issued.
(b) THAT each party to bear their own costs of this cause”
The Respondent R R Rwas duly served with the petition and summons. She failed to either enter appearance or to file a response to the petition. The matter therefore proceeded as an undefended cause.
In his evidence the Petitioner told the court that he is currently a musician working at the Serena Beach Hotel in Kigali Rwanda. He further testified that he married the Respondent on 31st January 1972 in the Registrar’s office in Mombasa. He produces a copy of the Marriage Certificate Serial No. [Particulars Withheld] as proof of this fact Pexb1. After the marriage the couple cohabited as man and wife in Ganjoni, Tudor and Nyali in Mombasa. They bore one daughter together who is now an adult aged 31 years and lives in London, United Kingdom. The Petitioner states that the marriage was not a happy one as the couple had several differences. They only stayed together for the sake of the child. For 28 years they occupied separate bed-rooms. From the year 2008 the couple have lived separately. The Petitioner now seeks a dissolution of the marriage.
In this case there has been no evidence to challenge the testimony of the Petitioner. Section 8 of the Matrimonial Causes Act provides the ground upon which a divorce may be granted. Section 8 is basically a ‘fault’ clause which asks the court to find either spouse ‘guilty’ of a matrimonial offence leading to the divorce. This is a case where it appears the parties had problems throughout the marriage and only stayed together for the sake of their child. The said child is now 31 years old and is an independent adult. The couple occupied separate bedrooms for most of their marriage (28 years) and since 2008 have lived separately – that is a period of six (6) years. What exists here is not a vibrant marital union but a mere shell of a marriage. The fact that the Respondent did not bother to reply to the petition is a pointer that she has no wish to remain tied to the Petitioner. All efforts at reconciliation have failed. It serves no useful purpose to compel the couple to remain tied together in matrimonial bonds when clearly they desire otherwise. I therefore allow this petition for divorce. Decree nisi to issue to be made absolute within three (3) months of todays date. No order on costs.
Dated and delivered in Mombasa this 13th day of February 2014.
M. ODERO
JUDGE