[2015] KEHC 7770 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 7770 (KLR)

The court held that the interim orders of 13th August 2015, which required the Respondents to surrender the child to the Child Welfare Society of Kenya, were valid and had not been complied with. No new circumstances had been presented to justify a stay or variation of those orders. However, recognizing the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 7770 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: A W; Respondent: J O E; Respondent: A M B E; New Life Home Trust; Little Angels Network; Child Welfare Society of Kenya
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 153 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Interlocutory Application for Production Order and Compliance With Interim Custody Orders
Outcome
Interim production and custody orders confirmed; time for compliance extended; further directions scheduled.
Legal Topics
Adoption Procedure, Child Custody, Best Interests of Child
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption Procedure Child Custody Best Interests of Child

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A W

Applicant

J O E

Respondent

A M B E

Respondent

New Life Home Trust

Little Angels Network

Child Welfare Society of Kenya

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Interlocutory Application for Production Order and Compliance With Interim Custody Orders

  1. 1 Whether the Respondents should be compelled to produce the child in court as per the interim orders.
  2. 2 Whether the interim custody orders of 13th August 2015 should be stayed or varied pending interpartes hearing.
  3. 3 What is the appropriate institution for the temporary placement of the child pending hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the interim orders of 13th August 2015, which required the Respondents to surrender the child to the Child Welfare Society of Kenya, were valid and had not been complied with. No new circumstances had been presented to justify a stay or variation of those orders. However, recognizing the Respondents' counsel's undertaking to comply and their logistical difficulties, the court granted additional time for compliance, directing that the child be produced and handed over to the Director of Children Services on a specified date and time. The court further ordered that the child should not leave the jurisdiction and that the Immigration Department be notified to prevent...

Court Disposition

Interim production and custody orders confirmed; time for compliance extended; further directions scheduled.

Orders

  • The child BABY M O (M.O) shall be handed over to the Director of Children Services on 21st August, 2015 at 10:00am in the presence of relevant parties.
  • The child shall be handed over to Director, Child Welfare Society of Kenya forthwith in compliance with the order of 13th August, 2015.