[2015] KEHC 6769 (KLR)
The court held that the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act, Cap 43, expressly excludes judgments relating to matrimonial causes, custody, and maintenance of children from its scope. The Tanzanian judgment sought to be adopted falls squarely within these excluded categories. Therefore, the application for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 6769 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: A Z U; Respondent: Z U M
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 101 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Adoption of Foreign Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Foreign Judgment Enforcement, Matrimonial Causes, Custody of Children, Child Maintenance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A Z U
Applicant
Z U M
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Adoption of Foreign Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a foreign judgment relating to dissolution of marriage, custody, and maintenance of children is enforceable in Kenya under the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act, Cap 43.
- 2 Whether the application for adoption of the Tanzanian judgment meets the statutory requirements for enforcement.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act, Cap 43, expressly excludes judgments relating to matrimonial causes, custody, and maintenance of children from its scope. The Tanzanian judgment sought to be adopted falls squarely within these excluded categories. Therefore, the application for adoption and enforcement of the foreign judgment is misconceived and cannot be granted under the Act. The court dismissed the application for lack of statutory basis, emphasizing that the law does not permit enforcement of such foreign judgments through the mechanism provided by Cap 43.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application dated 29th May 2014 is dismissed.
- There shall be no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MIS. APPLICATION 101 OF 2014 (OS)
A Z U……….……………………..…....APPLICANT
VERSUS
Z U M………........…..…………..…..RESPONDENT
RULING
The application dated 29th May 2014 seeks adoption of a foreign judgment delivered on 4th August 2010 by a court in Tanzania in the District Court of Ilala District at Samora Avenue, Tanzania in Matrimonial Cause No.24 of 2010, and for specific orders that the marriage between the parties be dissolved, custody of the minors be given to the mother, the respondent be responsible for the maintenance of the children of the marriage at the rate of USD 250 and the respondent be allowed to access the minor issues of the marriage.
The grounds and reasons on which the application is premised are set out in the face of the application and on the affidavit of the applicant. The Tanzanian court dissolved the marriage between the parties and awarded custody of the children of the marriage to the applicant. It had also been ordered that the respondent pay maintenance for the children at the rate of USD 250. The respondent was also awarded access rights to the children. The Tanzanian decree is the second divorce order for on 7th April 2010 the same marriage had been dissolved by a Dubai Court.
The judgment sought to be adopted was issued by a foreign court. Enforcement of foreign judgments is provided for under the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act, Cap 43, Laws of Kenya. The application dated 29th May 2014 is itself expressed as brought under Section 3 of the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act.
Section 3 of the Foreign Judgment (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act lists both the judgments to which it applies and the judgments it does not apply to.
The judgments to which the Act applies are set out in Section 3(1) of the Act. The Judgments listed under this provision does not include judgments relating to matrimonial causes, custody and maintenance of children.
Section 3(3) of the Act sets out judgments in respect of which the Act does not apply. It lists at paragraphs (c), (d) and (e) judgments in respect of periodical payment of money as maintenance of a spouse or a child or other person dependent the person against whom the order was made, judgments in matrimonial causes or matters, and judgments in proceedings in connection with the custody or guardianship of children.
The judgment sought to be adopted for enforcement is a foreign judgment which falls under Section 3(3) (c) (d) and (e) of the foreign judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act. It follows that the Act does not apply to the said judgment and the same is therefore not available for adoption and enforcement by the court under the said Act.
The application dated 29th May 2014 is consequently misconceived. It is available for dismissal and I hereby dismiss the same. There shall be no order as to costs.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 30th DAY OF January 2015.
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE