[2023] KENET 475 (KLR)

[2023] KENET 475 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the Environment and Land Court had already determined the substantive issues raised in the appeal, including the legality of the Environmental Impact Assessment License and development approvals, and had issued final orders declaring the approvals illegal, irregular, and null and void. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KENET 475 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Mohammed Ahmed Abdalla; Appellant: Salim Said; Appellant: Amin S. Salim; Appellant: Abdulaziz Abbas; Appellant: Richard A. S; Appellant: Bharat Devidas Vaitha Ketan Doshi; Respondent: National Environment Management Authority; Respondent: Khansa Developers Limited
Court
National Environment Tribunal - Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Appeal 39 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection (res Judicata)
Outcome
appeal struck out as res judicata
Judges
Emmanuel Mumia, Winnie Tsuma, Kariuki Muigua, Duncan Kuria, Ronald Allamano
Legal Topics
Res Judicata, Environmental Impact Assessment, Development Approvals, Constitutional Compliance
Source Language
en
Environmental Law Civil Procedure Res Judicata Environmental Impact Assessment Development Approvals Constitutional Compliance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohammed Ahmed Abdalla

Appellant

Salim Said

Appellant

Amin S. Salim

Appellant

Abdulaziz Abbas

Appellant

Richard A. S

Appellant

Bharat Devidas Vaitha Ketan Doshi

Appellant

National Environment Management Authority

Respondent

Khansa Developers Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection (res Judicata)

  1. 1 Whether the appeal is barred by the doctrine of res judicata due to prior determination by the Environment and Land Court.
  2. 2 Whether the Environmental Impact Assessment License and related development approvals were lawfully issued.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the Environment and Land Court had already determined the substantive issues raised in the appeal, including the legality of the Environmental Impact Assessment License and development approvals, and had issued final orders declaring the approvals illegal, irregular, and null and void. The parties in both proceedings were the same, and the reliefs sought overlapped. The Tribunal held that it lacked jurisdiction to re-adjudicate matters already conclusively determined by a superior court, and that the appeal was therefore barred by the doctrine of res judicata. No exceptional circumstances were demonstrated to depart from the general rule on costs, and the conduct...

Court Disposition

appeal struck out as res judicata

Orders

  • The appellant’s notice of appeal dated October 21, 2022 is struck out for offending the doctrine of res judicata.
  • Costs awarded to the 2nd respondent.