[2004] KEHC 1803 (KLR)
The court found that the sentence of 15 months imprisonment imposed by the trial magistrate exceeded the lawful maximum of 12 months for the offence. Additionally, as the appellant was a first offender who pleaded guilty, the law provided for an alternative of a fine, and the principle of leniency should have been...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] KEHC 1803 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Abdi Hirabe; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 388 of 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal_allowed_in_part
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, First Offender Treatment, Alternative to Custodial Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdi Hirabe
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of 15 months imprisonment imposed on the appellant exceeded the lawful maximum period for the offence.
- 2 Whether the trial court erred in failing to consider the option of a fine as provided by law for a first offender who pleaded guilty.
- 3 Whether the repatriation order issued was lawful and within the powers of the trial court.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the sentence of 15 months imprisonment imposed by the trial magistrate exceeded the lawful maximum of 12 months for the offence. Additionally, as the appellant was a first offender who pleaded guilty, the law provided for an alternative of a fine, and the principle of leniency should have been applied. The trial court erred by not considering the option of a fine and by imposing a custodial sentence beyond its jurisdiction. Furthermore, the repatriation order issued did not comply with the requirements of Section 26A of the Penal Code and was therefore unlawful. The appellate court substituted the custodial sentence with a fine of KES 10,000 and quashed the...
Court Disposition
appeal_allowed_in_part
Orders
- The sentence of imprisonment for 15 months is set aside and substituted with a fine of KES 10,000.
- The appellant shall be set free upon payment of the fine.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
14 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 388 OF 2003
(From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No. 2457 of 2003 of the Resident Magistrate’s Court at Kwale – L.N. MBATIA – SRM).
ABDI HIRABE…………………………………………..APPELLANT -VERSUS
REPUBLIC……………………………………………….RESPONDENT
J U D G M E N T
The appeal is only on the issue of sentence the appellant was given a term of imprisonment for 15 months. This is in excess of lawful punishment, which is a period not exceeding 12 months. Furthermore this is a first offender who pleaded guilty. The law provides punishment of payment of fine as an alternative to imprisonment. The main principle in sentencing is that an accused person who has pleaded guilty and is a first offender should be treated with leniency to facilitate reform. He has not wasted court’s time therefore the court should wherever there is an option of fine opt for non-custodial sentence. In this case Trial Magistrate exceeded her jurisdiction in imposing a term of imprisonment not provided for in the law.
I therefore set aside the imprisonment term and substitute the same with a fine of Shs.10,000/= only. Regarding the repatriation order Section 26A of the Penal Code sets out what are the powers of the court. The court may by directions to the Commissioner of Police and Commissioner of Prisons Order that the accused be removed and be kept out of Kenya immediately. This was not the order issued and therefore the same is quashed. The Penal Code empowers an appellate court to issue such directions but in the present situation this court is not with full facts to enable it to make such directions.
The result therefore is that the sentence of imprisonment for 15 months is hereby set aside and substituted with a fine of Shs.10,000/=.
The appellant shall be set free upon the payment of the fine.
The order of repatriation is hereby quashed.
Dated this 2nd day of January, 2004
JOYCE KHAMINWA
J U D G E