[2006] KEHC 3008 (KLR)

[2006] KEHC 3008 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant, having pleaded guilty to forgery, uttering a false cheque, and attempting to obtain money by false pretences, had abused a position of trust to attempt to steal a substantial sum from his employer. The sentence of three years' imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently, was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2006] KEHC 3008 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Abdi Rahman Omar Ahmed; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nakuru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 206 of 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Judges
DK Musinga
Legal Topics
Forgery, Uttering False Document, Attempted Obtaining by False Pretences
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Forgery Uttering False Document Attempted Obtaining by False Pretences

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abdi Rahman Omar Ahmed

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed for forgery, uttering a false document, and attempted obtaining by false pretences was excessive or warranted interference on appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant, having pleaded guilty to forgery, uttering a false cheque, and attempting to obtain money by false pretences, had abused a position of trust to attempt to steal a substantial sum from his employer. The sentence of three years' imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently, was not excessive or unjust. The court held that there was no basis for appellate interference, especially given the seriousness of the offences and the leniency of the sentence relative to the amount involved and the breach of trust. The appeal was therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The sentence of three years' imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently, is upheld.