[2018] KECA 644 (KLR)
The Court held that the appellant was entitled to withdraw his appeal, and that the applicant, having been served with the notice and record of appeal, became a respondent and was entitled to file a cross-appeal. The applicant was not required to file a separate record of appeal since the main record had already been filed by the appellant. Upon withdrawal of the main appeal, the applicant was allowed to proceed with his cross-appeal, subject to depositing security for costs as required by the rules. The Court found that the applicant's notice of appeal was to be deemed a notice of address for service, and that he had capacity to object to the withdrawal and to continue with the...
- Citation
- [2018] KECA 644 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Abdirahman Adan Abdikadir; Applicant: Adow Mohammed Abikar; Respondent: Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission; Respondent: County Returning Officer; Respondent: Abdullahi Ibrahim Ali
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2018
- Case Number
- Election Appeal 6 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Election Petition Appeal / Ruling on Withdrawal of Appeal and Application to Proceed With Cross Appeal
- Outcome
- Appellant granted leave to withdraw appeal with no order as to costs; applicant allowed to proceed with cross-appeal upon depositing security for costs; directions issued for further conduct of the cross-appeal.
- Judges
- DK Musinga, AK Murgor
- Legal Topics
- Withdrawal of Appeal, Cross Appeal Procedure, Security for Costs, Party Status, Service of Process
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdirahman Adan Abdikadir
Appellant
Adow Mohammed Abikar
Applicant
Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission
Respondent
County Returning Officer
Respondent
Abdullahi Ibrahim Ali
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Election Petition Appeal / Ruling on Withdrawal of Appeal and Application to Proceed With Cross Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant should be granted leave to withdraw the appeal with no order as to costs.
- 2 Whether the applicant, having filed a notice of cross-appeal, can be allowed to proceed with the cross-appeal after withdrawal of the main appeal.
- 3 Whether the applicant was required to file a record of appeal and deposit security for costs.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the appellant was entitled to withdraw his appeal, and that the applicant, having been served with the notice and record of appeal, became a respondent and was entitled to file a cross-appeal. The applicant was not required to file a separate record of appeal since the main record had already been filed by the appellant. Upon withdrawal of the main appeal, the applicant was allowed to proceed with his cross-appeal, subject to depositing security for costs as required by the rules. The Court found that the applicant's notice of appeal was to be deemed a notice of address for service, and that he had capacity to object to the withdrawal and to continue with the...
Court Disposition
Appellant granted leave to withdraw appeal with no order as to costs; applicant allowed to proceed with cross-appeal upon depositing security for costs; directions issued for further conduct of the cross-appeal.
Orders
- Leave granted to appellant to withdraw the appeal with no order as to costs.
- Applicant, Adow Mohammed Abikar, shall be the appellant in terms of the notice of cross-appeal dated 8th March, 2018.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment