[2017] KEHC 1916 (KLR)
The court held that the hearing of the petition is not subject to the completion of the read-only access to the Kiems Kits data. Directions had already been given regarding the access exercise, and the Deputy Registrar is to file a report on the exercise. Further affidavits must strictly relate to the matters...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 1916 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Abdirahman Hussein Weytan Mohammed; Applicant: Abdikadir S. Hassan; Respondent: IEBC; Respondent: Adan Harar Noor, Returning Officer Mandera East Constituency; Respondent: Hon. Hassan Omar Mohamed Maalim; Interested Party: Hon Hamaldin Adan Ahmed
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Election Petition 3 & 9 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Election Petition / Pre Hearing Directions
- Outcome
- Pre-hearing directions issued; applications to strike out further affidavits disallowed; request for additional affidavit by interested party declined.
- Legal Topics
- Access to Electoral Materials, Affidavit Filing Rules, Pretrial Case Management
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdirahman Hussein Weytan Mohammed
Applicant
Abdikadir S. Hassan
Applicant
IEBC
Respondent
Adan Harar Noor, Returning Officer Mandera East Constituency
Respondent
Hon. Hassan Omar Mohamed Maalim
Respondent
Hon Hamaldin Adan Ahmed
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Pre Hearing Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the hearing of the petition is contingent on completion of read-only access to Kiems Kits data.
- 2 Whether further affidavits filed by the petitioners introduce new issues or evidence outside the scope of the petition.
- 3 Whether applications to strike out further affidavits are necessary or can be dispensed with under the Election Petition Rules.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the hearing of the petition is not subject to the completion of the read-only access to the Kiems Kits data. Directions had already been given regarding the access exercise, and the Deputy Registrar is to file a report on the exercise. Further affidavits must strictly relate to the matters pleaded in the petition; any new issues or evidence introduced will not be considered by the court, and deponents will not be cross-examined on such matters. Applications to strike out further affidavits are unnecessary and will not be entertained due to time constraints under the Election Petition Rules. The application by the 1st and 2nd respondents to strike out the further...
Court Disposition
Pre-hearing directions issued; applications to strike out further affidavits disallowed; request for additional affidavit by interested party declined.
Orders
- Read-only access exercise at IEBC to take place on 7th November 2017 at 9:00 a.m. until completion; Deputy Registrar to file report by 13th November 2017.
- 2nd petitioner to file and serve further affidavits by 4 p.m. today if not already filed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
36 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
ELECTION PETITION N0. 3 OF 2017
CONSOLIDATED WITH ELECTION PETITION N0. 9 of 2017
BETWEEN
ABDIRAHMAN HUSSEIN WEYTAN MOHAMMED…….....1ST PETITIONER
ABDIKADIR S. HASSAN………………………....................2ND PETITIONER
AND
IEBC..................................................................................1ST RESPONDENT
ADAN HARAR NOOR;
RETURNING OFFICER MANDERA
EAST CONSTITUENCY...................................................2ND RESPONDENT
HON. HASSAN OMAR MOHAMED MAALIM.................3RD RESPONDENT
AND
HON HAMALDIN ADAN AHMED………………..........INTERESTED PARTY
DIRECTIONS
This Election Petition has been slated for the first phase of hearing on 1st – 3rd November 2017. These dates were agreed upon by all parties after a pretrial conference was conducted on 23rd October 2017 and directions given.
The whole purpose of a pretrial conference is the management of court proceedings and all parties including the court must be committed to it.
The issue that has been popping up every now and then is one of access to the Kiems Kits. Directions have been given over and over again on this. I have however gone through the record and I do not see anywhere directed or agreed that the hearing of this petition is subject to the completion of the read only access of the Kiems Kits data.
- This court has also given directions to the effect that it is only the Deputy Registrar who will file a report in court on the read only access exercise.
- Counsels were given the liberty to make their observations during the exercise which may be used in their submissions, since the Deputy Registrar’s report will have been filed and also served on them. The 1st respondent has confirmed that they will be available for the access exercise on 7th November 2017.
- Issues have been raised by the respondents on the further affidavit filed by the 1st petitioner. The 1st & 2nd respondents have filed an application seeking to strike it out wholly or partially.
- This court again on 23/10/2017 gave directions to the effect that:
“The further affidavits to be filed Must strictly relate to the petition as pleaded.”
The court was therefore clear on what has to be filed as further affidavits.
It therefore follows that any new issues/matters/evidence introduced in the further affidavits will not be considered at all by this court, when writing its Judgment. The deponents will also not be cross-examined on such new matters.
There will be no need of filing applications to strike the further affidavits out as there is no time for hearing such applications in line with Rule 15(2) of the Election Petition Rules. Counsels will also be at liberty to submit on any such issue at the close of the hearing. The application by the 1st & 2nd respondents dated 31st October 2017 is therefore disallowed. The request by the interested party to file yet another affidavit is declined for the reason that he has already filed two affidavits before this court. His standing in this matter is clear from the Ruling allowing his enjoinment.
In view of the above, I give the following directions:
(a) The read only access exercise at IEBC to take place on 7th November 2017 at 9. 00a.m. upto completion on the same day. All parties are asked to co-operate for the exercise to run smoothly. The Deputy Registrar will file her full report on the exercise on or before 13th November, 2017.
(b) The 2nd petitioner to file and serve his further affidavits by 4p.m. today, if he has not yet filed them.
(c) The respondents to file and serve their responses to the further affidavits by 12 noon on 2nd November, 2017.
(d) Hearing of the Election Petition to commence on 2nd November 2017 – 2p.m. sharp.
………………………
H.I. ONG’UDI
JUDGE
1/11/2017