[2005] KEHC 3241 (KLR)
The court found that while the five-year imprisonment sentence was appropriate given the quantity of heroin involved (1.564 kilograms), the fine of 1 million shillings lacked a legal basis because no evidence was presented regarding the street value of the drugs. The statute requires the fine to be either 1 million...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] KEHC 3241 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Abdul Raheem Justice Bakare Alias Ibrahim Salamin Agbo Lagade; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 541 of 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against sentence partially allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, Narcotic Drugs Offences, Appeal Against Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdul Raheem Justice Bakare Alias Ibrahim Salamin Agbo Lagade
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of five years imprisonment and a fine of 1 million shillings for trafficking in narcotic drugs was lawful and appropriate.
- 2 Whether the trial court had a proper basis for imposing the fine in the absence of evidence of the drug's street value.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while the five-year imprisonment sentence was appropriate given the quantity of heroin involved (1.564 kilograms), the fine of 1 million shillings lacked a legal basis because no evidence was presented regarding the street value of the drugs. The statute requires the fine to be either 1 million shillings or three times the value of the drug, whichever is greater, and in the absence of evidence on value, the trial court could not lawfully determine the appropriate fine. Consequently, the order imposing the fine and the default sentence was set aside, but the custodial sentence was upheld. The court also ordered the appellant's repatriation to Nigeria after serving the...
Court Disposition
Appeal against sentence partially allowed.
Orders
- The order of a fine of 1 million shillings and the default sentence of 3 years imprisonment is set aside.
- The appellant shall serve five years imprisonment from the date of sentence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL DIVISION
Criminal Appeal 541 of 2003
(From original conviction(s) and Sentence(s) in Criminal case No. 4508 of 2003 of the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Kibera (Ms. Mwangi – P.M.)
ABDUL RAHEEM JUSTICE BAKARE Alias IBRAHIM SALAMIN AGBO LAGADE….…………..APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…………………… …………………………....RESPONDENT
J U D G M E N T
The Appellant, ABDUL RAHEEM JUSTICE BAKARE Alias IBRAHIM SALAMIN AGBO LAGADE has appealed only against the sentence. He had pleaded guilty to the offence of TRAFFICKING IN NARCOTIC DRUGS contrary to Section 4(a) of the NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES (CONTROL) Act No. 4 of 1994. He was sentenced to five years imprisonment and to a fine of 1 million in default 3 years imprisonment.
In his submission the Appellant said that he was remorseful for the offence and pleaded for mercy and leniency from the Court. He also said he needed to go for a medical operation not available to him while in prison. He annexed no document to substantiate his claim.
MISS OKUMUlearned counsel for the State opposed the appeal against sentence.
MISS OKUMUsubmitted that the sentence of 5 years imprisonment and a fine of 1 million, in default 3 years imprisonment was quite lenient. She also urged Court to order for Appellant’s repatriation on serving the sentence.
I have considered the appeal. The amount of heroine involved was 1. 564 kilograms which is quite a lot if it got into the streets in Nairobi it would cause great and disastrous effects on the society especially the youth. I will not disturb the sentence of 5 years imprisonment for the offence. As for the fine of 1 million, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance (Control) Actis very clear that the fine to be imposed should either be 1 million or three times the value of the drug, whichever is greater.No evidence was adduced to show the street value of the drug. Consequently the learned trial magistrate had no evidence before her and lacked any basis of determining the nature of the fine to impose. The fine imposed therefore lacked basis and cannot be allowed to stand.
Consequently I set aside the order of fine of 1 million and the default sentence of 3 years imprisonment.
The upshot of the appeal is that the Appellant should serve five years imprisonment from the date of sentence.
I also order that he should be repatriated to his home country of Nigeria after sentence.
It is so ordered.
Dated at Nairobi this 15th day of June 2005.
LESIIT, J.
JUDGE
Read, signed and delivered in the presence of;
LESIIT, J.
JUDGE