[2017] KEHC 4352 (KLR)
The High Court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal directly from the Jubilee Appeals Tribunal, as the statutory framework under the Political Parties Act requires that such disputes be first referred to the Political Parties Dispute Tribunal. The court's appellate jurisdiction is limited to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 4352 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Abdul Salam Kassim; Respondent: Hazel Nyamoki Katana; Respondent: Jubilee Party Kenya
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Election Petition 87 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Election Petition Appeal / Ruling on Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Appeal struck out for want of jurisdiction.
- Judges
- LA Achode
- Legal Topics
- Party Primaries Disputes, Jurisdiction of High Court, Internal Dispute Resolution, Political Parties Act
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdul Salam Kassim
Appellant
Hazel Nyamoki Katana
Respondent
Jubilee Party Kenya
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Election Petition Appeal / Ruling on Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear appeals directly from the Jubilee Appeals Tribunal without recourse to the Political Parties Dispute Tribunal.
- 2 Whether the appeal is properly before the High Court in light of the statutory dispute resolution framework under the Political Parties Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal directly from the Jubilee Appeals Tribunal, as the statutory framework under the Political Parties Act requires that such disputes be first referred to the Political Parties Dispute Tribunal. The court's appellate jurisdiction is limited to decisions emanating from the Political Parties Dispute Tribunal, not from internal party tribunals. As the appellant bypassed the required statutory process, the appeal and any applications arising from it were struck out for want of jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Appeal struck out for want of jurisdiction.
Orders
- The appeal and all applications arising therefrom are struck out for want of jurisdiction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
ELECTION PETITION APPEAL NO. 87 OF 2017
ABDUL SALAM KASSIM….………..…….APPELLANT
VERSUS
HAZEL NYAMOKI KATANA…......…1ST RESPONDENT
JUBILEE PARTY KENYA….…...…2ND RESPONDENT
(Being an Appeal from the judgment of the Jubilee Appeals Tribunal on 27th day of May, 2017 in JAT Case No. 346 of 2017)
R U L I N G
1. This appeal arises out of the decision made on 27th May, 2017 by the Jubilee Appeals Tribunal (hereinafter JAT) in which it upheld the 1st Respondent’s complaint in Complaint No. 346 of 2017. The Appellant prays that the orders granted on 27th May, 2017 by the JAT be set aside and be substituted therefore with an order dismissing the 1st Respondent’s Complaint. Further that the court do restrain the 2nd Respondent from presenting the 1st Respondent to IEBC and/or revoking the nomination certificate issued by the IEBC in his favour for the position of Senator, Mombasa County.
2. The Appellant’s appeal is premised on grounds that the JAT erred in law and fact in:
i. Upholding the 1st Respondent’s Complaint;
ii. Failing to give the Appellant time to lodge his defence or make appearance against the 1st Respondent’s complaint;
iii. Finding that 1st Respondent had discharged her evidential burden whilst he had not furnished any evidence to vary the his declaration of nomination;
iv. In cancelling the results of two polling stations that fundamentally affected the voters therein without any legal basis and on misrepresentation by the 1st Respondent;
v. In declaring the 1st Respondent the duly nominated aspirant based on 4 polling stations rather than 6.
3. The jurisdiction of the High Court in matters pertaining to Party primaries is provided by Section 41(2) Political Parties Act 2011 which states as follows:
“An Appeal shall lie from the decision of the Tribunal to the High Court on points of law and facts and on points of law to both the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court.”(emphasis mine)
The jurisdiction of the High Court in disputes of this nature is therefore confined to appeals from the Political Parties Dispute Tribunal.
4. Section 40(2)of thePolitical Parties Act stipulates that disputes between party members and the party are first to be referred to the Internal Dispute Resolution Mechanism of the party, in this case the Jubilee Appeals Tribunal. Thereafter it is the Political Parties Dispute Tribunal which has jurisdiction to determine disputes of this nature in the manner set out under Section 40(1)and(2)of thePolitical Parties Act.
5. The powers that this court has over matters falling under Section 40 of the Political Parties Act are appellate from the decisions of Political Parties Dispute Tribunal. It has no powers to hear matters directly from the Internal Dispute Resolution Mechanisms of the respective parties.
6. Reasons where for the court finds that the Appellant is improperly before this court and consequently the appeal and the application flowing therefrom are struck out for want of jurisdiction.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 31st DAY OF May, 2017.
L. ACHODE
JUDGE
In the presence of ………….....for the Appellant
In the presence of …………….for the Respondents