[2023] KEELC 16088 (KLR)
The court held that, in the interest of justice and in observance of the right to be heard, the application to suspend the delivery of judgment and to reopen the case for the admission of new and compelling evidence should take priority over the delivery of judgment in the main suit. The court emphasized that the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEELC 16088 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Kennedy Ochieng Abich; Defendant: Joshua Okinyi Amula (Sued as the Legal Representative of Amula Atudo - Deceased)
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 7 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application to Suspend Judgment and Reopen Case
- Outcome
- Application for suspension of judgment and reopening of case granted for hearing; directions issued for filing of replies and submissions.
- Judges
- GMA Ongondo
- Legal Topics
- Reopening of Case, Admission of New Evidence, Consolidation of Suits, Right to Be Heard
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kennedy Ochieng Abich
Plaintiff
Joshua Okinyi Amula (Sued as the Legal Representative of Amula Atudo - Deceased)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application to Suspend Judgment and Reopen Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should suspend the delivery of judgment to allow the defendant to adduce new and compelling evidence.
- 2 Whether the pleadings in Homa Bay ELC Case No 19 of 2021 should be admitted and consolidated with the present suit.
- 3 Whether the right to be heard under Articles 48 and 50(1) of the Constitution justifies reopening the case.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, in the interest of justice and in observance of the right to be heard, the application to suspend the delivery of judgment and to reopen the case for the admission of new and compelling evidence should take priority over the delivery of judgment in the main suit. The court emphasized that the right to be heard is a fundamental principle that must be upheld, and that the application should be determined before any final judgment is rendered. The court therefore directed that the respondent file a reply, and that the application be heard by way of written submissions, with further directions to follow.
Court Disposition
Application for suspension of judgment and reopening of case granted for hearing; directions issued for filing of replies and submissions.
Orders
- The application to suspend judgment takes priority over delivery of judgment in the main suit.
- Respondent’s counsel to file and serve reply to the application; applicant’s counsel may file further affidavit within 10 days from service of reply.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Abich v Amula (Sued as the Legal Representative of Amula Atudo - Deceased) (Environment & Land Case 7 of 2022) [2023] KEELC 16088 (KLR) (14 March 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEELC 16088 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
Environment & Land Case 7 of 2022
GMA Ongondo, J
March 14, 2023
Between
Kennedy Ochieng Abich
Plaintiff
and
Joshua Okinyi Amula (Sued as the Legal Representative of Amula Atudo - Deceased)
Defendant
Ruling
1. This ruling in lieu of judgment is provoked by the applicant/defendant’s Notice of Motion application dated February 7, 2023 and filed herein on March 8, 2023.
2. The applicant through the firm of Aluoch Odera & Nyauke Advocates, via the said application, has sought the orders infra:a.Spentb.The honourable court be pleased to suspend judgment fixed for March 14, 2023 and thereby place this matter again before the court for further orders.c.Upon granting prayer (b) above, the court be pleased to reopen this case for defence to furnish the honourable court with new and compelling evidence to be considered before the final disposal of this matter.d.Further, the honourable court is pleased to admit pleadings in Homa Bay ELC Case No 19 of 2021 and the said Homa Bay ELC Case No 19 of 2021 consolidated with this file for final consideration and disposal.e.The cost of this application be provided for to abide the outcome of the main suit herein.
3. This court subscribes to the Court of Appeal decision in James Kanyiita Nderitu & another v Marios Philotas Ghikas & another [2016] eKLR where the court stated that the right to be heard before an adverse decision is taken against a person is fundamental and permeates our entire justice system (see also Halsbury’s Laws of England, 5thEdition 2010 Vol 61 Para 639).
4. In the interest of justice and pursuant to, inter alia, Articles 48 and 50 (1) of theConstitution of Kenya, 2010, this court hereby orders and directs that the application takes priority over delivery of judgment in the main suit.
5. The respondent’s counsel to file and serve reply to the application and the applicant’s counsel may file further affidavit within 10 days from the date of service of the reply.
6. The application be heard by way of written submissions. So, the applicant’s counsel and the respondent’s counsel to file and serve submissions within 10 days from the date of service of the reply to the application and 10 days from the date of service of the applicant’s submissions respectively.
7. This application is fixed for further directions on April 17, 2023.
8. Orders accordingly.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED THIS 14TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023. G.M.A ONGONDOJUDGEPresentOdhiambo instructed by Ms. Odera, learned counsel for the defendant/applicantMs. Oriche instructed by Mr. Migele, learned counsel for the plaintiff/respondentEdith and Mutiva- Court Assistants