[2022] KEELC 1029 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's memorandum of appeal was filed within the statutory 30-day period after excluding the relevant dates under Order 50 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The court determined that the applicant's appeal was arguable, as the preliminary objection on limitation was dismissed on the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEELC 1029 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Abigael Barmao; Respondent: Grace Wamboi Macharia
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Appeal E003 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application for stay of proceedings allowed
- Judges
- EO Obaga
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Proceedings, Limitation of Actions, Appeals From Subordinate Courts, Computation of Time
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abigael Barmao
Applicant
Grace Wamboi Macharia
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has made out a case for stay of proceedings pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the memorandum of appeal was filed within the statutory time limit.
- 3 Whether the respondent will suffer prejudice if stay is granted.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's memorandum of appeal was filed within the statutory 30-day period after excluding the relevant dates under Order 50 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The court determined that the applicant's appeal was arguable, as the preliminary objection on limitation was dismissed on the basis that it should be addressed at the main hearing. The court further held that no prejudice would be suffered by the respondent if stay was granted, and that proceeding with the lower court case would render the appeal an academic exercise. Accordingly, the court allowed the application for stay of proceedings pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.
Court Disposition
application for stay of proceedings allowed
Orders
- Stay of proceedings in Eldoret CMC Land Case No. 108 of 2019 pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
- Application allowed in terms of prayers (3) and (4) of the motion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT OF KENYA
AT ELDORET
ELCA NO. E003 OF 2021
ABIGAEL BARMAO............................................................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
GRACE WAMBOI MACHARIA.......................................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. This is a ruling in respect of a Notice of motion dated 28th May, 2021 in which the Applicant seeks stay of proceedings in Eldoret CMC Land case No. 108 of 2019 pending the hearing and determination of an appeal filed by the Applicant to this Court.
2. The Applicant contends that she filed a preliminary objection in the lower Court on grounds that the Respondent’s suit was statute barred. The preliminary objection was canvassed by way of written submission but it was dismissed.
3. The Applicant argues that the suit in the lower Court has been set down for hearing and that unless the proceedings are stayed, the hearing will proceed to full hearing which will render the appeal nugatory.
4. The Applicant’s application is opposed by the Respondent through a replying affidavit sworn on 21st of July, 2021. The Respondent contends that the Applicant’s appeal was filed out of time without leave of the Court and that the application for stay of proceedings is intended to delay the finalization of the case which is before the lower Court.
5. The Respondent further argues that the Applicant has not disclosed that she filed a similar application before the lower Court which application was dismissed and further that the Applicant has not annexed the ruling of the lower Court which dismissed the preliminary objection for this Court to appreciate the reasoning of the trial magistrate.
6. I have considered the Applicant’s application as well as the opposition to the same by the Respondent. I have also considered the oral submissions by Counsel for the parties during the hearing of this application. The only issue for determination is whether the Applicant has made out a case for stay of proceedings.
7. There was a contention that the memorandum of appeal was filed out of time. Under section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act, an appeal from a subordinate Court is supposed to be filed within 30 days. The ruling which is the subject of this appeal was delivered on 17th December, 2020. The memorandum of appeal was filed on 8th February, 2021. Under order 50 Rule 4 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the period between 21st December and 13th January of the following year is omitted from computation of time. If this period is taken out, it follows that the Applicant filed her memorandum of appeal on the 29th day which is within the 30 days required.
8. In considering whether to stay proceedings, the Court has to consider the merits of the appeal; whether there will be any prejudice suffered by the Respondent and whether the appeal will be rendered nugatory. In the instant case, the Applicant contends that her preliminary objection was dismissed on the ground that the issue of limitation ought to be addressed during the main hearing. If this be the case, then the Applicant’s appeal is arguable and an arguable appeal is not one which will necessarily succeed.
9. There will also be no prejudice suffered by the Respondent if proceedings are stayed. If proceedings were to go on, the Applicant’s appeal will be rendered and academic exercise. I therefore find that the Applicant’s application has merits. I allow the same in terms of prayers (3) and (4).
It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT ELDORET ON THIS 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2022.
E. OBAGA
JUDGE
IN THE VIRTUAL PRESENCE OF;
MS. KOSGEY FOR MR. OMBOTO FOR RESPONDENT.
MS. LUGWE FOR APPLICANt.
COURT ASSISTANT –ALBERT
E. OBAGA
JUDGE
3RD MARCH, 2022