[2014] KEELC 416 (KLR)

[2014] KEELC 416 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff is the registered owner of the suit land, as evidenced by the title deed and the uncontroverted testimony. The defendant failed to file a defence or present any evidence of a legal right to occupy the land. By virtue of Section 25 of the Land Registration Act, the plaintiff is...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEELC 416 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Abigael Barmao; Defendant: Mwangi Theuri
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 393 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's suit allowed in part; eviction and permanent injunction granted; no award for mesne profits, general damages, or costs.
Legal Topics
Eviction, Ownership Dispute, Permanent Injunction
Source Language
en
Land and Property Eviction Ownership Dispute Permanent Injunction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abigael Barmao

Plaintiff

Mwangi Theuri

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is the lawful owner of land parcel Uasin Gishu/Kahungura Scheme/237 as against the defendant.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant has any legal right to occupy or remain on the suit land.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to orders of eviction and permanent injunction against the defendant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff is the registered owner of the suit land, as evidenced by the title deed and the uncontroverted testimony. The defendant failed to file a defence or present any evidence of a legal right to occupy the land. By virtue of Section 25 of the Land Registration Act, the plaintiff is entitled to exclusive possession and all proprietary rights over the land. The defendant's continued occupation is unlawful. The court declined to award mesne profits or general damages due to lack of evidence and the plaintiff's failure to pay the full purchase price. No order as to costs was made, considering the plaintiff's conduct regarding the incomplete payment. The court...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's suit allowed in part; eviction and permanent injunction granted; no award for mesne profits, general damages, or costs.

Orders

  • The defendant shall vacate the suit land within 30 days upon service of the judgment/decree.
  • If the defendant fails to vacate, the plaintiff is at liberty to move the court for an order of eviction.