https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/6047

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/6047

The application for stay of execution was dismissed because the parties had already compromised the judgment through a consent on settlement that had not been varied, and the court found no exceptional basis to interfere with that agreement.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 6047 (KLR)
Parties
1st Appellant: Abiria Coaches Limited; 2nd Appellant: Paul Chege; Respondent: Lucy Wanjiru
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E091 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Judges
["LP Kassan"]
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Consent Judgment, Variation of Consent, Settlement Agreement
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appellate Practice Stay of Execution Consent Judgment Variation of Consent Settlement Agreement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abiria Coaches Limited

1st Appellant

Paul Chege

2nd Appellant

Lucy Wanjiru

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution

  1. 1 Whether the court should grant stay of execution of the lower court judgment.
  2. 2 Whether the court can interfere with a consent entered into by the parties and left unvaried.

Ratio Decidendi

The application for stay of execution was dismissed because the parties had already compromised the judgment through a consent on settlement that had not been varied, and the court found no exceptional basis to interfere with that agreement.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Stay of execution declined.
  • Application dismissed with costs.