[2023] KEELC 21758 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 21758 (KLR)

The court found that the application for leave to amend the originating summons was unopposed, firm, and meritorious, having considered the supporting affidavit and annexed documents. In the absence of any response from the respondent, and upon review of the grounds and materials presented, the court exercised its...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 21758 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Monika Adoyo Abok (Suing as the Legal Representative of Joseph Ochieng Odote); Respondent: Ogeta Nyakinda alias Charles Ogeta Nyakina
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E001 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Originating Summons / Ruling on Application for Leave to Amend Originating Summons
Outcome
Application allowed as prayed in orders 1 and 2; costs in the cause.
Judges
GMA Ongondo
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Leave of Court, Originating Summons Procedure
Source Language
en
Land and Property Amendment of Pleadings Leave of Court Originating Summons Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Monika Adoyo Abok (Suing as the Legal Representative of Joseph Ochieng Odote)

Applicant

Ogeta Nyakinda alias Charles Ogeta Nyakina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Originating Summons / Ruling on Application for Leave to Amend Originating Summons

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to amend the originating summons as per the draft annexed.
  2. 2 Whether the amended originating summons should be deemed duly filed and served.
  3. 3 Who should bear the costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application for leave to amend the originating summons was unopposed, firm, and meritorious, having considered the supporting affidavit and annexed documents. In the absence of any response from the respondent, and upon review of the grounds and materials presented, the court exercised its discretion to allow the application as prayed in orders 1 and 2, permitting the amendment of the originating summons and deeming the amended summons duly filed and served. Costs were ordered to be in the cause.

Court Disposition

Application allowed as prayed in orders 1 and 2; costs in the cause.

Orders

  • Leave granted to the applicant to amend the originating summons as per the draft annexed.
  • The amended originating summons is deemed to have been duly filed and served.