[2022] KEHC 12359 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 12359 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to provide a credible or satisfactory explanation for the inordinate delay of over two years in seeking leave to appeal out of time. The court noted that there was no record of any earlier appeal filed by the applicant, and all such appeals by prisoners are duly processed by...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 12359 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Yusuf Abdi Abonyo; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E065 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Sentence Reduction, Defilement Offence, Sexual Offences Act, Inordinate Delay
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Leave to Appeal Out of Time Sentence Reduction Defilement Offence Sexual Offences Act Inordinate Delay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yusuf Abdi Abonyo

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient explanation for the delay in filing an appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the sentence imposed was unlawful or excessive under the Sexual Offences Act.
  3. 3 Whether the application for leave to appeal out of time is merited.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to provide a credible or satisfactory explanation for the inordinate delay of over two years in seeking leave to appeal out of time. The court noted that there was no record of any earlier appeal filed by the applicant, and all such appeals by prisoners are duly processed by the court. The applicant's claim was found to lack honesty and credibility. Furthermore, the sentence of 30 years imprisonment for defilement was within the lawful range prescribed by the Sexual Offences Act and was neither mandatory nor unlawful. The application was deemed mischievous and an afterthought, and thus devoid of merit.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application filed on 16/6/2022 is dismissed.
  • File closed.