[2018] KEELC 411 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 411 (KLR)

The court found that the dispute revolved around Eldoret Municipality Block 14/731 and not Block 13/543, and that the reference to Block 13/543 in the judgment was a mistake. Applying the slip rule under Section 99 of the Civil Procedure Act, the court held that it had jurisdiction to correct the clerical error in...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 411 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Abraham Kibet Chepkonga t/a A. K. Chepkonga & Company Advocates; Respondent: Paul Gicheru t/a Gicheru & Company Advocates
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 156 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Correct Judgment Under Slip Rule
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
A Ombwayo
Legal Topics
Slip Rule Corrections, Clerical Errors in Judgments, Amendment of Decrees, Land Parcel Identification
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Slip Rule Corrections Clerical Errors in Judgments Amendment of Decrees Land Parcel Identification

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abraham Kibet Chepkonga t/a A. K. Chepkonga & Company Advocates

Applicant

Paul Gicheru t/a Gicheru & Company Advocates

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Correct Judgment Under Slip Rule

  1. 1 Whether the court can correct a clerical error in the judgment regarding the description of the suit property under the slip rule.
  2. 2 Whether the correction would materially alter the substance of the judgment or affect third party rights.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the dispute revolved around Eldoret Municipality Block 14/731 and not Block 13/543, and that the reference to Block 13/543 in the judgment was a mistake. Applying the slip rule under Section 99 of the Civil Procedure Act, the court held that it had jurisdiction to correct the clerical error in the judgment and decree. The correction did not introduce a new issue or party but merely rectified the property description to reflect the true subject of the proceedings. The court ordered that the judgment and decree be amended to refer to Eldoret Municipality Block 14/731, as originally intended by the pleadings and evidence.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The judgment at page 20 is corrected to refer to Eldoret Municipality Block 14/731 instead of Eldoret Municipality Block 13/543.
  • The decree is to be amended to read Eldoret Municipality/Block 14/731.