[2020] KEHC 6890 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 6890 (KLR)

The court found no sufficient reason or legal basis to interfere with the sentence of 20 years imprisonment imposed on the applicant for the offence of stealing. The mere existence of the COVID-19 crisis did not, in the court's view, constitute a ground for revision of the sentence. The trial court's discretion in...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 6890 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Abraham Leparshan; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nanyuki
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 86 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Order on Revision
Outcome
application for revision dismissed
Legal Topics
Stealing, Sentencing, Revisionary Jurisdiction
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Stealing Sentencing Revisionary Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abraham Leparshan

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Order on Revision

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the applicant for the offence of stealing should be revised by the High Court.
  2. 2 Whether the COVID-19 crisis constitutes a sufficient ground for interference with the sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found no sufficient reason or legal basis to interfere with the sentence of 20 years imprisonment imposed on the applicant for the offence of stealing. The mere existence of the COVID-19 crisis did not, in the court's view, constitute a ground for revision of the sentence. The trial court's discretion in sentencing was not shown to have been exercised improperly or in violation of the law. Accordingly, the application for revision was declined.

Court Disposition

application for revision dismissed

Orders

  • No interference with the sentence imposed by the trial court.
  • Application for revision is declined.