[2016] KEHC 3686 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant's conviction was proper as he understood the charge and pleaded guilty. The sentence of a Kshs. 100,000 fine or 24 months imprisonment was within statutory limits and not excessive, considering the seriousness of the offence and the appellant's mitigation. However, the order for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 3686 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Abshir Abduqadir Hag; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Garissa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 111 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal against sentence dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld; order for ATPU interrogation set aside; repatriation ordered.
- Judges
- GMA Dulu
- Legal Topics
- Immigration Offences, Sentencing Principles, Plea of Guilty
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abshir Abduqadir Hag
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the appellant for being unlawfully present in Kenya was harsh and excessive.
- 2 Whether the order for interrogation by ATPU Wajir County before repatriation was lawful.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant's conviction was proper as he understood the charge and pleaded guilty. The sentence of a Kshs. 100,000 fine or 24 months imprisonment was within statutory limits and not excessive, considering the seriousness of the offence and the appellant's mitigation. However, the order for interrogation by ATPU Wajir County before repatriation was not grounded in law and was therefore set aside. The proper order is for the appellant to be repatriated to Somalia after serving the sentence or paying the fine.
Court Disposition
Appeal against sentence dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld; order for ATPU interrogation set aside; repatriation ordered.
Orders
- Conviction and sentence of the appellant are upheld.
- Order for interrogation by ATPU Wajir County after serving sentence is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT GARISSA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 111 OF 2015
ABSHIR ABDUQADIR HAG...APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC.…..….................RESPONDENT
(From the conviction and sentence in Wajir SPM Criminal Case No. 430 of 2015 – B. Rogocho RM)
JUDGMENT
The appellant was charged in the principal magistrates court at Wajir with being unlawfully present in Kenya contrary to section 53 (1) (j) as read with section 53 (2) of the Kenya Citizenship and Immigration Act No. 5 of 2011. The particulars of the offence were that on 24th October 2015 at around 2320 hours at Tarbaj road block along Wajir – Mandera road, within Tarbaj District being a Somali citizen was found being in Kenya illegally and without any valid permit.
He was recorded as pleading guilty to the charge. Thereafter the prosecutor said the facts were as per charge sheet, and the appellant said the facts were correct. He was thus convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of Kshs. 100,000/= and in default to serve 24 months imprisonment. The magistrate also made an order that he should thereafter be interrogated by the ATPU Wajir County before repatriation back to Somalia.
He has now come to this court on appeal against sentence. In his submissions he emphasized that he pleaded guilty and that he was a father of two daughters and had a sick old mother. He said that he was the bread winner and that the sentence was harsh and excessive.
Mr. Okemwa learned prosecution counsel urged the court to peruse the factors taken into account in sentencing the appellant. Counsel questioned the orders of the trial court which required the appellant to be interrogated by ATPU after serving sentence.
I have perused the record and in my view though the prosecutor took a short cut in stating that the facts were as per charge sheet, it is clear that the appellant understood the charge and the facts he was pleading to. He has not appealed against conviction. In my view the conviction was proper. I uphold the conviction.
On sentence, the appellant pleaded guilty to the charge. He had no previous record and asked for leniency. He did not waste the court’s time. However in my view this is a serious offence. The maximum sentence for the offence is Kshs. 500,000/= in default 3 years imprisonment. He was sentenced to pay a fine of Kshs.100,000/= and in default to serve 24 months imprisonment, which in my view was not excessive. I will uphold the conviction and the sentence.
As for the order of the trial court for interrogation by ATPU Wajir before repatriation back to Somalia, I find that order not to be grounded on the law. The proper order would be for the appellant to be repatriated back to Somalia. I therefore set aside the order requiring the appellant to be interrogated by the ATPU Wajir County after serving sentence, and order that he be repatriated back to Somalia after serving the prison sentence or paying the fine.
It is so ordered.
Dated and delivered at Garissa this 18th day of August 2016
GEORGE DULU
JUDGE