[2024] KEHC 7866 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 7866 (KLR)

The court found that the record of appeal was incomplete, as it contained full proceedings only for Milimani CMCCC No. 7315 of 2019 and not for Milimani CMCCC No. 8354 of 2019, despite the appeal purporting to arise from both. There was no evidence of a formal consolidation order in the record. The absence of a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 7866 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Saida Abubakar; Appellant: Mohamed Yusuf; Appellant: Kadija Mohammed Yusuf; Respondent: Anthony Karume Munge
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E785 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Ruling on Completeness of Appeal Record
Outcome
Appeal not determined; file returned for completion of record.
Judges
WM Musyoka
Legal Topics
Appeal Record Completeness, Consolidation of Suits, Procedural Irregularities
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Appeal Record Completeness Consolidation of Suits Procedural Irregularities

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Saida Abubakar

Appellant

Mohamed Yusuf

Appellant

Kadija Mohammed Yusuf

Appellant

Anthony Karume Munge

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Ruling on Completeness of Appeal Record

  1. 1 Whether the appeal record is complete and sufficient for the court to proceed to judgment.
  2. 2 Whether there was proper consolidation of the two trial court causes.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the record of appeal was incomplete, as it contained full proceedings only for Milimani CMCCC No. 7315 of 2019 and not for Milimani CMCCC No. 8354 of 2019, despite the appeal purporting to arise from both. There was no evidence of a formal consolidation order in the record. The absence of a complete record for both causes precludes the court from writing a judgment, as it would be procedurally improper and potentially prejudicial to the parties. The court therefore directed that the file be returned to the registry for the record to be completed before judgment can be written.

Court Disposition

Appeal not determined; file returned for completion of record.

Orders

  • The appeal file is returned to the registry at Milimani Law Courts for the Deputy Registrar to cause the record to be completed.
  • Upon completion, the file may be returned to the judge for judgment-writing.