[1998] KECA 153 (KLR)

[1998] KECA 153 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing the record of appeal, namely the late provision of certified copies of proceedings and judgment and the Certificate of Delay, which were essential for lodging the appeal. The court held that the delay was not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1998] KECA 153 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Abudi Ali Mahadhi; Respondent: Ramadhan Saidi; Respondent: Freight Forwarders
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 106 of 1998
Procedural Posture
Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Record of Appeal
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Certificate of Delay
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Process Certificate of Delay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abudi Ali Mahadhi

Applicant

Ramadhan Saidi

Respondent

Freight Forwarders

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient reason for the delay in filing the record of appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the delay in obtaining the Certificate of Delay and certified copies of proceedings constitutes inordinate delay.
  3. 3 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to extend time for filing the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing the record of appeal, namely the late provision of certified copies of proceedings and judgment and the Certificate of Delay, which were essential for lodging the appeal. The court held that the delay was not inordinate and that the interests of justice required the applicant to be allowed to exercise his right of appeal. The court therefore exercised its discretion in favour of the applicant and extended the time for filing the appeal by 21 days from the date of the order.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Time for filing the record of appeal is extended by 21 days from the date of this order.
  • Costs of the application shall be costs in the appeal.