[2023] KEELRC 3262 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 3262 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant's contract of service with the respondent lapsed on 13.06.2016 when he resigned. However, the claim for salary arrears was time-barred under section 90 of the Employment Act, as the claim was filed more than three years after the cause of action arose and more than twelve months...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 3262 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Calvin Abuya; Respondent: Principal Secretary, Ministry of Health
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E565 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
suit dismissed
Judges
B Ongaya
Legal Topics
Salary Arrears, Limitation Periods, Resignation, Clearance Certificate, Disciplinary Procedure
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Salary Arrears Limitation Periods Resignation Clearance Certificate Disciplinary Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Calvin Abuya

Applicant

Principal Secretary, Ministry of Health

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to salary arrears for the period of alleged non-payment.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to a clearance certificate and certificate of last payment from the respondent.
  3. 3 Whether the suit is time-barred under section 90 of the Employment Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant's contract of service with the respondent lapsed on 13.06.2016 when he resigned. However, the claim for salary arrears was time-barred under section 90 of the Employment Act, as the claim was filed more than three years after the cause of action arose and more than twelve months after any continuing injury. The court also noted that the respondent would not be liable for salary arrears during the period the claimant was seconded to Kisumu County. As a result, the suit was dismissed for being time-barred, and each party was ordered to bear its own costs.

Court Disposition

suit dismissed

Orders

  • The suit is dismissed as time-barred under section 90 of the Employment Act.
  • Each party to bear its own costs.