[2025] KEHC 6564 (KLR)
The court found that, in the interest of access to justice as enshrined in Article 48 of the Constitution, and pursuant to the powers conferred by section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act, it was appropriate to transfer the suit from Maseno Law Courts to Kombewa Law Courts. The court considered the geographical...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 6564 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Benard Oriwo Achar; Respondent: David Silvester Owino Ojigo; Respondent: William Otieno
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Miscellaneous Application 9 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Transfer of Suit
- Outcome
- Application for transfer of suit allowed; file transferred to Kombewa Law Courts.
- Judges
- A Mabeya
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Suit, Jurisdiction of Courts, Access to Justice
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Benard Oriwo Achar
Applicant
David Silvester Owino Ojigo
Respondent
William Otieno
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Transfer of Suit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court should transfer the suit from Maseno Law Courts to Kombewa Law Courts for hearing and determination.
- 2 Whether the transfer is necessary to promote access to justice under Article 48 of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, in the interest of access to justice as enshrined in Article 48 of the Constitution, and pursuant to the powers conferred by section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act, it was appropriate to transfer the suit from Maseno Law Courts to Kombewa Law Courts. The court considered the geographical jurisdiction and convenience for the parties, and determined that the transfer would facilitate a fair and efficient hearing and determination of the matter. There being no objection from the respondents, the court exercised its discretion to order the transfer and directed that the matter be mentioned before the Head of Station at Kombewa Law Court for further directions.
Court Disposition
Application for transfer of suit allowed; file transferred to Kombewa Law Courts.
Orders
- The file is withdrawn from Maseno Law Courts and transferred to Kombewa Law Courts for hearing and determination.
- Mention on 3/6/2025 before the Head of Station, Kombewa Law Court for further directions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
Achar v Ojigo & another (Civil Miscellaneous Application 9 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 6564 (KLR) (21 May 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 6564 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Civil Miscellaneous Application 9 of 2025
A Mabeya, J
May 21, 2025
Between
Benard Oriwo Achar
Plaintiff
and
David Silvester Owino Ojigo
1st Defendant
William Otieno
2nd Defendant
Ruling
1. I have considered the geographical jurisdiction of the Magistrate’s Courts of Maseno and Kombewa. In accordance with the principle of access to justice under Article 48 of the Constitution of Kenya, I hereby exercise the jurisdiction of this Court under section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act and hereby have this File withdrawn from Maseno Law Courts and transferred to Kombewa Law Courts for hearing and determination.
2. Mention on 3/6/2025 before the Head of Station, Kombewa Law Court for further directions.
3. This file is marked as closed.It is so ordered.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 21ST DAY OF MAY, 2025A. MABEYA, FCI, ArbJUDGE