[2025] KEHC 7939 (KLR)
The court found that the trial court had, in its judgment delivered on 26th October 2021, expressly indicated that the time spent in remand custody by the applicant had been considered in the computation of his sentence. Therefore, the applicant's contention that the remand period was not taken into account was unfounded. As a result, the application for sentence review lacked merit and was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 7939 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Shadrack Achevi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kibera
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 9 June 2025
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E089 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Sentence Review After Conviction and Appeal Dismissal
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- DR Kavedza
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Review, Remand Custody Credit, Sexual Offences, Indecent Act With Child
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shadrack Achevi
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Sentence Review After Conviction and Appeal Dismissal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial court considered the time the applicant spent in remand custody when computing the sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the trial court had, in its judgment delivered on 26th October 2021, expressly indicated that the time spent in remand custody by the applicant had been considered in the computation of his sentence. Therefore, the applicant's contention that the remand period was not taken into account was unfounded. As a result, the application for sentence review lacked merit and was dismissed.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for sentence review is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment