[2015] KEHC 1316 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 1316 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed costs as there was a valid certificate of costs, no reference had been filed to challenge the taxation, and there was no dispute on retainer. The absence of opposition from the respondent further supported the grant of the orders sought....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 1316 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Achola Jaoko & Co. Advocate; Respondent: Africa Merchant Assurance Company Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 748 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment After Taxation of Advocate Client Bill of Costs
Outcome
application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs with interest; no order as to costs of the application
Legal Topics
Advocate Client Costs, Taxation of Costs, Judgment Entry
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Advocate Client Costs Taxation of Costs Judgment Entry

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Achola Jaoko & Co. Advocate

Applicant

Africa Merchant Assurance Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment After Taxation of Advocate Client Bill of Costs

  1. 1 Whether the advocate is entitled to judgment for the taxed costs as per the certificate of costs.
  2. 2 Whether there is any opposition, reference, or dispute on retainer to bar entry of judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed costs as there was a valid certificate of costs, no reference had been filed to challenge the taxation, and there was no dispute on retainer. The absence of opposition from the respondent further supported the grant of the orders sought. Accordingly, judgment was entered for the applicant for the taxed sum with interest as specified.

Court Disposition

application allowed; judgment entered for applicant for taxed costs with interest; no order as to costs of the application

Orders

  • Judgment entered for the advocate/applicant for KES 212,468.70 with interest at 14% from 9th July 2015 until payment in full.
  • A decree to issue accordingly.