[2023] KEHC 21452 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 21452 (KLR)

The court found that it was in the interest of justice to allow the client to file a reference challenging the bill of costs taxed by the taxing master, especially since the bill was allowed unopposed. The court determined that any prejudice to the advocate could be compensated by an award of costs. Accordingly, the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 21452 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Achola Jaoko & Company Advocates; Respondent: Lucas Odhiambo Dishon
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Miscellaneous Application E294 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Reference Against Taxation
Outcome
Application allowed; leave granted to file reference out of time.
Judges
AN Ongeri
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Leave to File Reference, Bill of Costs, Extension of Time
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Leave to File Reference Bill of Costs Extension of Time

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Achola Jaoko & Company Advocates

Applicant

Lucas Odhiambo Dishon

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Reference Against Taxation

  1. 1 Whether the client should be granted leave to file a reference against the taxing master’s certificate of taxation out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the advocate would suffer prejudice if leave is granted to the client to challenge the bill of costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that it was in the interest of justice to allow the client to file a reference challenging the bill of costs taxed by the taxing master, especially since the bill was allowed unopposed. The court determined that any prejudice to the advocate could be compensated by an award of costs. Accordingly, the client was granted 30 days to file the reference and submissions, and the advocate was granted 30 days to respond upon service. The court also ordered the client to pay the costs of the application.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; leave granted to file reference out of time.

Orders

  • The client is granted 30 days to file the reference and submissions.
  • The advocate is granted 30 days to file submissions upon being served with the reference and submissions by the client.