https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kecopt/2026/278

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kecopt/2026/278

The Claimant proved by documentary evidence that he was a member, withdrew from the Sacco, and held shares worth Kshs. 184,449.22, while the Respondent failed to produce evidence of an AGM resolution or financial basis for suspending refunds. The dividend claim failed because the Claimant produced no evidence that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KECOPT 278 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Eric Titus Achola; Respondent: Metropolitan National Sacco Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E050 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Cooperative Tribunal Claim for Refund of Shares and Dividends After Withdrawal From Sacco Membership / Judgment
Outcome
Claim partly allowed
Judges
["J Mwatsama", "B Sawe", "F Lotuiya", "M Chesikaw", "PO Aol"]
Legal Topics
Refund of Member Shares, Accrued Dividends, Burden of Proof, Evidentiary Proof, Interest and Costs, AGM Resolutions and Refunds Suspension
Source Language
en
Co Operative Law Sacco Law Civil Procedure Refund of Member Shares Accrued Dividends Burden of Proof Evidentiary Proof Interest and Costs +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eric Titus Achola

Claimant

Metropolitan National Sacco Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Cooperative Tribunal Claim for Refund of Shares and Dividends After Withdrawal From Sacco Membership / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant proved entitlement to refund of shares of Kshs. 184,449.22
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant proved entitlement to accrued dividends of Kshs. 25,823.00
  3. 3 What orders should issue on interest and costs

Ratio Decidendi

The Claimant proved by documentary evidence that he was a member, withdrew from the Sacco, and held shares worth Kshs. 184,449.22, while the Respondent failed to produce evidence of an AGM resolution or financial basis for suspending refunds. The dividend claim failed because the Claimant produced no evidence that dividends were declared or payable. Judgment therefore issued for refund of shares with interest, but not for dividends.

Court Disposition

Claim partly allowed

Orders

  • The Respondent shall pay the Claimant Kshs. 184,449.22 being refund of shares.
  • The sum in the preceding order shall attract interest at court rates from 17th February 2023 until payment in full.