[2021] KEHC 135 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 135 (KLR)

The court found that while the applicant had demonstrated financial hardship due to prevailing economic conditions and the Covid-19 pandemic, the proposed payment plan was unreasonably protracted and would unduly prejudice the decree holder. The court exercised its discretion to allow payment by instalments but...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 135 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Acorn Properties Limited; Respondent: Eng. Isaac Gathungu Wanjohi; Respondent: Isabella Nyaguthi Wanjohi; Respondent: Gumba Investiments Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 305 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Payment of Decretal Sum by Instalments
Outcome
Application for payment of decretal sum by instalments allowed on modified terms.
Judges
F Tuiyott
Legal Topics
Arbitral Award Enforcement, Payment by Instalments, Debt Recovery, Execution of Decree
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Arbitral Award Enforcement Payment by Instalments Debt Recovery Execution of Decree

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Acorn Properties Limited

Applicant

Eng. Isaac Gathungu Wanjohi

Respondent

Isabella Nyaguthi Wanjohi

Respondent

Gumba Investiments Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Payment of Decretal Sum by Instalments

  1. 1 Whether the court should allow the judgment debtor to pay the decretal sum by instalments.
  2. 2 What constitutes a fair and reasonable payment plan in the circumstances of the case.
  3. 3 Whether the court has jurisdiction to entertain the application in light of the Arbitration Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that while the applicant had demonstrated financial hardship due to prevailing economic conditions and the Covid-19 pandemic, the proposed payment plan was unreasonably protracted and would unduly prejudice the decree holder. The court exercised its discretion to allow payment by instalments but imposed terms that would ensure a fair balance: a substantial deposit of Kshs.10,500,000 to be paid within 30 days, followed by monthly instalments of Kshs.4,000,000, reviewable upwards after six months. The court held that this arrangement was just, considering the size of the debt and the need to avoid oppressive delay in satisfaction of the decree. The court also clarified that...

Court Disposition

Application for payment of decretal sum by instalments allowed on modified terms.

Orders

  • A deposit of Kshs.10,500,000 to be paid within 30 days of the ruling.
  • Monthly instalments of Kshs.4,000,000 to commence 60 days from the ruling and thereafter on or before the 5th day of each succeeding month.