[2015] KEHC 3260 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 3260 (KLR)

The court found that the purported will presented by the respondent did not meet the legal requirements of a valid will and therefore the deceased was deemed to have died intestate. Applying the Law of Succession Act, the court held that all children, including daughters, are entitled to equal shares of the estate...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 3260 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Adda Ndakala Handa; Applicant: Noah Nduku Handa; Respondent: Edward Omwaka Handa
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 336 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Distribution of Estate
Outcome
Estate distributed according to the applicant's proposal; intestacy declared; each party to bear own costs.
Judges
SJ Chitembwe, AT Sitati
Legal Topics
Intestate Succession, Distribution of Estate, Rights of Children, Polygamous Estates
Source Language
en
Family and Children Intestate Succession Distribution of Estate Rights of Children Polygamous Estates

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Adda Ndakala Handa

Applicant

Noah Nduku Handa

Applicant

Edward Omwaka Handa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Distribution of Estate

  1. 1 Whether the deceased died testate or intestate.
  2. 2 How the estate of the deceased should be distributed among the beneficiaries.
  3. 3 Whether all children, including daughters, are entitled to equal shares under the Law of Succession Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the purported will presented by the respondent did not meet the legal requirements of a valid will and therefore the deceased was deemed to have died intestate. Applying the Law of Succession Act, the court held that all children, including daughters, are entitled to equal shares of the estate regardless of gender or house. The court determined that the proposed distribution by the applicant was fair, as it recognized the prior benefit received by the children of the second house from plots 1256 and 1572, while the first house would inherit plot 7956. The court further directed that a portion of plot 7956 be registered jointly for the benefit of the commercial houses,...

Court Disposition

Estate distributed according to the applicant's proposal; intestacy declared; each party to bear own costs.

Orders

  • Plots 1256 and 1572 to be inherited by the children of the second house as specified.
  • Plot 7956 to be inherited by Adda Ndakala Handa and her children, with a portion of 0.5 acres to be registered jointly in the names of Noah Nduku and Edward Handa for commercial houses.