[2021] KEHC 643 (KLR)
The court determined that the two petitions, both concerning the removal of the Governor of Wajir County by way of impeachment, disclose the same cause of action and raise similar questions of law. Consolidation is appropriate under Rule 17 of the Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms)...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 643 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Aden Ibrahim Mohammed; Petitioner: Omar Jele Abdi; Petitioner: Bashir Ahmed Hussein; Petitioner: Safiya Mahamed Abdi; Petitioner: Yussuf Ibrahim Dimbil; Petitioner: Council of Governors; Respondent: County Assembly of Wajir; Respondent: Clerk of the County Assembly of Wajir; Respondent: Speaker of the Wajir County Assembly; Respondent: Abdullahi Issack; Respondent: Speaker of the Senate; Respondent: The Senate; Respondent: The Attorney General; Interested Party: HE. The Governor of Wajir County Amb. Mohammed Abdi Mohammud; Interested Party: The Deputy Governor Ahmed Ali Mukhtar; Interested Party: The Chief Registrar of the High Court; Interested Party: Assumption of Office Committee
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Constitutional Petition E009 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Directions on Consolidation and Hearing
- Outcome
- Petitions consolidated for hearing; directions issued for conduct of proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- Impeachment Proceedings, County Government Removal, Consolidation of Petitions, Judicial Case Management
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aden Ibrahim Mohammed
Petitioner
Omar Jele Abdi
Petitioner
Bashir Ahmed Hussein
Petitioner
Safiya Mahamed Abdi
Petitioner
Yussuf Ibrahim Dimbil
Petitioner
Council of Governors
Petitioner
County Assembly of Wajir
Respondent
Clerk of the County Assembly of Wajir
Respondent
Speaker of the Wajir County Assembly
Respondent
Abdullahi Issack
Respondent
Speaker of the Senate
Respondent
The Senate
Respondent
The Attorney General
Respondent
HE. The Governor of Wajir County Amb. Mohammed Abdi Mohammud
Interested Party
The Deputy Governor Ahmed Ali Mukhtar
Interested Party
The Chief Registrar of the High Court
Interested Party
Assumption of Office Committee
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Directions on Consolidation and Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the two petitions concerning the removal of the Governor of Wajir County should be consolidated for hearing.
- 2 Whether consolidation would prejudice any party or affect the positions in the pleadings.
- 3 Whether preliminary objections on competence should be heard separately or as part of the consolidated petition.
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that the two petitions, both concerning the removal of the Governor of Wajir County by way of impeachment, disclose the same cause of action and raise similar questions of law. Consolidation is appropriate under Rule 17 of the Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) Practice and Procedure Rules, 2013, as it serves the overriding objective of efficient judicial management. The court found that no party would be prejudiced by consolidation, and that all parties retain their positions in the pleadings. Preliminary objections and applications, including those concerning competence and interim orders, may be raised and argued within the...
Court Disposition
Petitions consolidated for hearing; directions issued for conduct of proceedings.
Orders
- The two petitions are consolidated and shall be heard together.
- Time allocations for submissions are set as specified in the directions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
53 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO E009 OF 2021
IN THE MATTER OF CONSTITUTION OF KENYA ARTICLES 1, 2(1) & (2) & (5), 3(1) & (2), 4(2), 10, 19, 20, 21, 22(1) & (2) (b) & (c), 23(1), 24(1), 3(1) (a), 35, 38(1), 47(1) & (2), 48, 50, 52, 93, 96, 165(3) (b) & (d) (ii), 73(1), 75(1) (c), 174, 175, 181, 196(1) (b), 200, 258, 259, 260
AND
IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLES 1, 2, 3, 47, 50(b) & (c), 181 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA (PROTECTION OF RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES 2013
AND
IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLES 1, 3, 25(a) OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS OF 1966
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT ACT 2012, SECTIONS 8, 30, 31, 33(1) & (2), 87
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE STANDING ORDER NO 67 OF THE WAJIR COUNTY ASSEMBLY STANDING ORDERS
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE INTENDED REMOVAL FROM OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OF WAJIR COUNTY BY WAY OF IMPEACHMENT
BETWEEN
ADEN IBRAHIM MOHAMMED.......................................................1ST PETITIONER
OMAR JELE ABDI..............................................................................2ND PETITIONER
BASHIR AHMED HUSSEIN..............................................................3RD PETITIONER
SAFIYA MAHAMED ABDI.................................................................4TH PETITIONER
YUSSUF IBRAHIM DIMBIL..............................................................5TH PETITIONER
COUNCIL OF GOVERNORS.............................................................6TH PETITIONER
VERSUS
COUNTY ASSEMBLY OF WAJIR....................................................1ST RESPONDENT
CLERK OF THE COUNTY ASSEMBLY OF WAJIR....................2ND RESPONDENT
SPEAKER OF THE WAJIR COUNTY ASSEMBLY......................3RD RESPONDENT
ABDULLAHI ISSACK........................................................................4TH RESPONDENT
SPEAKER OF THE SENATE............................................................5TH RESPONDENT
THE SENATE.......................................................................................6TH RESPONDENT
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL............................................................7TH RESPONDENT
AND
HE. THE GOVERNOR OF WAJIR COUNTY AMB. MOHAMMED ABDI
MOHAMMUD..........................................................................1ST INTERESTED PARTY
THE DEPUTY GOVERNOR AHMED ALI MUKHTAR...2ND INTERESTED PARTY
THE CHIEF REGISTRAR OF THE HIGH COURT..........3RD INTERESTED PARTY
ASSUMPTION OF OFFICE COMMITTEE........................4TH INTERESTED PARTY
DIRECTIONS
The two Petitions disclose the same cause of action regarding the removal of the 1st Interested Party in No E009 of 2021 and the 1st Petitioner in No 17 of 2021. We see possibility of similar question of law arising for determination in both.
Where such is in cause, the Rules 17 of the Constitution of Kenya (Protection of rights and fundamental freedoms) Practice and Procedure Rules, 2013. Rules permit the consolidation of such petitions either on own notion by the court or upon application. We consider that to be one of the tools designed to achieve overriding objectives of the court and that of the Rules.
With that appreciation we direct that the two petitions be consolidated and heard together.
In directing that the Petitions be consolidated, we have given due regard to the concerns raised by counsel for the 1st – 4th Respondents and take the view that the question of competence of a Petition even if taken as a Preliminary point can be raised and argued as an opposition to the petition and not separately to help with efficient employed of judicial time.
We have equally given due regard to the concerns by counsel for the 2nd Interested Party on his application for discharge of the interim orders and we take the view that consolidation doesn’t take away or subtract from a parties’ position in the pleadings.
We see no prejudice being visited upon any of the parties by the order of consolidation.
For purposes of offering submissions in the consolidated petition, Professor Ojienda from the 1st Interested party in Petition No E009 of 2021 and 1st Petitioner in No E017 OF 2021 shall present his case as the Petitioner while Mr. Issa for 2nd Interested Party in Petition E007 of 2021 and 3rd Respondent in Petition No 17 of 2021 shall submit as a Respondent and address both Petitions.
TIME ALLOCATION
i. The Petitioners shall have 1 hour to be shared between the two counsels.
ii. The Respondents represented by S. C. Ahmeednassir and Mr. Issa, shall share one hour between them while Ms. Thanji will rely on the Written Submissions filed.
iii. Thereafter the Petitioners will have ten (10) minutes each to respond to anything arising on a point of law from the submissions by the Respondents.
Mr. Issa will then have ten (10) minutes to respond to any question of law raised by the Petitioner in opposition to his application for setting aside.
DATEDAND DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
EDWARD MURIITHI PATRICK J.O OTIENO WAMAE T.W CHERERE
PRESIDING JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE