[2021] KEHC 643 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 643 (KLR)

The court determined that the two petitions, both concerning the removal of the Governor of Wajir County by way of impeachment, disclose the same cause of action and raise similar questions of law. Consolidation is appropriate under Rule 17 of the Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms)...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 643 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: Aden Ibrahim Mohammed; Petitioner: Omar Jele Abdi; Petitioner: Bashir Ahmed Hussein; Petitioner: Safiya Mahamed Abdi; Petitioner: Yussuf Ibrahim Dimbil; Petitioner: Council of Governors; Respondent: County Assembly of Wajir; Respondent: Clerk of the County Assembly of Wajir; Respondent: Speaker of the Wajir County Assembly; Respondent: Abdullahi Issack; Respondent: Speaker of the Senate; Respondent: The Senate; Respondent: The Attorney General; Interested Party: HE. The Governor of Wajir County Amb. Mohammed Abdi Mohammud; Interested Party: The Deputy Governor Ahmed Ali Mukhtar; Interested Party: The Chief Registrar of the High Court; Interested Party: Assumption of Office Committee
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Constitutional Petition E009 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Directions on Consolidation and Hearing
Outcome
Petitions consolidated for hearing; directions issued for conduct of proceedings.
Legal Topics
Impeachment Proceedings, County Government Removal, Consolidation of Petitions, Judicial Case Management
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Administrative Law Impeachment Proceedings County Government Removal Consolidation of Petitions Judicial Case Management

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Aden Ibrahim Mohammed

Petitioner

Omar Jele Abdi

Petitioner

Bashir Ahmed Hussein

Petitioner

Safiya Mahamed Abdi

Petitioner

Yussuf Ibrahim Dimbil

Petitioner

Council of Governors

Petitioner

County Assembly of Wajir

Respondent

Clerk of the County Assembly of Wajir

Respondent

Speaker of the Wajir County Assembly

Respondent

Abdullahi Issack

Respondent

Speaker of the Senate

Respondent

The Senate

Respondent

The Attorney General

Respondent

HE. The Governor of Wajir County Amb. Mohammed Abdi Mohammud

Interested Party

The Deputy Governor Ahmed Ali Mukhtar

Interested Party

The Chief Registrar of the High Court

Interested Party

Assumption of Office Committee

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Directions on Consolidation and Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the two petitions concerning the removal of the Governor of Wajir County should be consolidated for hearing.
  2. 2 Whether consolidation would prejudice any party or affect the positions in the pleadings.
  3. 3 Whether preliminary objections on competence should be heard separately or as part of the consolidated petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the two petitions, both concerning the removal of the Governor of Wajir County by way of impeachment, disclose the same cause of action and raise similar questions of law. Consolidation is appropriate under Rule 17 of the Constitution of Kenya (Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms) Practice and Procedure Rules, 2013, as it serves the overriding objective of efficient judicial management. The court found that no party would be prejudiced by consolidation, and that all parties retain their positions in the pleadings. Preliminary objections and applications, including those concerning competence and interim orders, may be raised and argued within the...

Court Disposition

Petitions consolidated for hearing; directions issued for conduct of proceedings.

Orders

  • The two petitions are consolidated and shall be heard together.
  • Time allocations for submissions are set as specified in the directions.