[2021] KEHC 6151 (KLR)
The court held that the interim orders previously issued on 18th May 2021, as confirmed on 24th May 2021, remain in force pending the inter partes hearing of the application. The court found no sufficient reason to extend or clarify the orders further at this stage. Directions were issued for service of notices of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 6151 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Aden Ibrahim Mohammed; Applicant: Omar Jele Abdi; Applicant: Bishar Ahmed Hussein; Applicant: Safiya Mahamed Abdi; Applicant: Yussuf Ibrahim Dimbil; Respondent: County Assembly of Wajir; Respondent: Clerk of the County Assembly of Wajir; Respondent: Speaker of the Wajir County Assembly; Respondent: Abdullahi Issack; Respondent: Speaker of the Senate; Respondent: The Senate
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Constitutional Petition 009 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Directions/preliminary Orders
- Outcome
- Directions issued; interim orders remain in force; matter stood over for compliance and further directions.
- Legal Topics
- Impeachment Proceedings, County Government Removal, Due Process Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aden Ibrahim Mohammed
Applicant
Omar Jele Abdi
Applicant
Bishar Ahmed Hussein
Applicant
Safiya Mahamed Abdi
Applicant
Yussuf Ibrahim Dimbil
Applicant
County Assembly of Wajir
Respondent
Clerk of the County Assembly of Wajir
Respondent
Speaker of the Wajir County Assembly
Respondent
Abdullahi Issack
Respondent
Speaker of the Senate
Respondent
The Senate
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Directions/preliminary Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the impeachment process against the Governor of Wajir County complied with constitutional and statutory requirements.
- 2 Whether the petitioners' rights to fair administrative action and fair hearing were violated during the impeachment process.
- 3 Whether the orders previously issued should be extended or clarified pending the hearing.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the interim orders previously issued on 18th May 2021, as confirmed on 24th May 2021, remain in force pending the inter partes hearing of the application. The court found no sufficient reason to extend or clarify the orders further at this stage. Directions were issued for service of notices of change of advocate and the further amended petition, and for the petitioners' advocates to agree on team leadership for drawing pleadings. The request for leave to amend the petition was kept in abeyance pending such agreement. The matter was stood over for compliance confirmation and further directions.
Court Disposition
Directions issued; interim orders remain in force; matter stood over for compliance and further directions.
Orders
- Notices of Change of Advocate by Mr. Marete and Mr. Omwanza to be served within 24 hours.
- Further Amended Petition to be served upon all parties by close of business on 11th June 2021, indicating changes.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
49 paragraphs
THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO. E 009 OF 2021
IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA ARTICLES 1, 2(1), (2) and (5), 3(1) and (2) , 4(2), 10, 19,20, 21,22(1) and 2(b) and (c), 23(1) 24(1) 33(1) (a), .35,38 (1) 47(1) and (2), 48,50,52,93,96,165(3) (b) and (d) (ii) 73(1), 75(1) (c) 174,175, 181,196(1) (b) 200, 258, 260
AND
IN THE MATTER OF ART. 1, 2, 3, 47, 50 (B) AND (C), 181 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA (PROTECTION OF RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS PRACTICE AND PROCEDURES RULES 213
AND
IN THE MATTER OF ART. 1,3, AND ART. 25(a) OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS OF 1966
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE COUNTY GOVERNMENT ACT 2012, SECTION 8, 30, 31 33(1) AND (2) AND 87
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE STANDING ORDER NO. 67 OF THE WAJIR COUNTY ASSEMBLY STANDING ORDERS
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE INTENDED REMOVAL FROM OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OF WAJIR COUNTY BY WAY OF IMPEACHMENT
BETWEEN
ADEN IBRAHIM MOHAMMED ....................................................................................1ST PETITIONER
OMAR JELE ABDI .........................................................................................................2ND PETITIONER
BISHAR AHMED HUSSEIN...........................................................................................3RD PETITIONER
SAFIYA MAHAMED ABDI ............................................................................................4TH PETITIONER
YUSSUF IBRAHIM DIMBIL..........................................................................................5TH PETITIONER
VERSUS
COUNTY ASSEMBLY OF WAJIR .............................................................................1ST RESPONDENT
CLERK OF THE COUNTY ASSEMBLY OF WAJIR...............................................2ND RESPONDENT
SPEAKER OF THE WAJIR COUNTY ASSEMBLY .................................................3RD RESPONDENT
ABDULLAHI ISSACK..................................................................................................4TH RESPONDENT
SPEAKER OF THE SENATE ......................................................................................5TH RESPONDENT
THE SENATE.................................................................................................................6TH RESPONDENT
AND
HE. THE GOVERNOR OF WAJIR COUNTY
AMB. MOHAMMED ABDI MOHAMMUD .......................................................1ST INTERESTED PARTY
THE DEPUTY GOVERNOR AHMED ALI MUKHTAR .................................2ND INTERESTED PARTY
THE CHIEF REGISTRAR OF THE HIGH COURT..........................................3RD INTERESTED PARTY
ASSUMPTION OF OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR COMMITTEE...............4TH INTERESTED PARTY
DIRECTIONS
i. Let the Notices of Change of Advocate by Mr. Marete and Mr. Omwanza be served forthwith and within 24 hours from now.
ii. Let the Further Amended Petition be served upon all the parties with due and accurate indication of what has been added or excluded. That be not later than the close of business on Friday 11th June 2021.
iii. The four advocates for the petitioners; Mr. Ndegwa, Mr. Wanyama, Mr. Omwanza and Mr. Marete ought to agree on who between them should be in charge of the team and for purposes of drawing pleadings, in particular.
iv. Pending that agreement the request for leave to amend the petition by Mr. Omwanzq and Mr. Marete is kept in abeyance.
v. On request by Mr. Ndegwa and Mr. Wanyama that we do extend the orders of 18th May 2021 or clarify them, we say that the said orders were issued pending the inter partes hearing of the application of 18/5/2021, as confirmed on 24/5/2021. They remain in force and we see no need to consider extending them.
vi. Matter stood over to 18/6/2021 at 10 a.m, virtually, to confirm compliance and for further directions as to hearing.
E. Muriithi
Judge
Patrick J O Otieno
Judge
T. W Cherere
Judge Judge
9/6/2021