In re Estate of Kipkosgei Kiplagat Kamar (Deceased) (Succession Cause 59 of 1997) [2025] KEHC 18420 (KLR) (15 December 2025) (Ruling)
Applicants established a prima facie case as the 1st and 4th Administrators, despite a valid consent order and unchallenged surveyor's sketch, have interfered with the 2nd house's allocated 366 acres. The court has jurisdiction to grant injunctive relief to preserve the estate and prevent irreparable harm, and the balance of convenience favours maintaining the status quo until final determination.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 18420 (KLR)
- Parties
- 1st Administrator/respondent: John Kibet Kamar; 2nd Administrator: Tapyotin Kimoi Kamar; 3rd Administrator: Joseph Kipkosgei Kamar; 4th Administrator/respondent: Charles Kibiwott Kamar; 1st Objector/applicant: Ruth Jemutai Kamar; 2nd Objector/applicant: Margaret Jepkoech Kamar; 3rd Objector/applicant: Jeruiyot Kipkosgey (Everlyn); 4th Objector/applicant: Jane Jesanai Nakadony; 5th Objector/applicant: Elizabeth Jepyego Kamar; 6th Objector/applicant: Hellen Jesire Kipkemoi
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2025
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 59 of 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications for Injunction
- Outcome
- Applications allowed
- Legal Topics
- Administration of Estates, Intermeddling With Estate Property, Temporary Injunctions, Implementation of Consent Orders
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Kibet Kamar
1st Administrator/respondent
Tapyotin Kimoi Kamar
2nd Administrator
Joseph Kipkosgei Kamar
3rd Administrator
Charles Kibiwott Kamar
4th Administrator/respondent
Ruth Jemutai Kamar
1st Objector/applicant
Margaret Jepkoech Kamar
2nd Objector/applicant
Jeruiyot Kipkosgey (Everlyn)
3rd Objector/applicant
Jane Jesanai Nakadony
4th Objector/applicant
Elizabeth Jepyego Kamar
5th Objector/applicant
Hellen Jesire Kipkemoi
6th Objector/applicant
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Interlocutory Applications for Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a temporary injunction should issue restraining the 1st and 4th Administrators and/or their agents from interfering with the 2nd house's occupation and use of 366 acres on L.R. No. 7439 (Sigowo)
Ratio Decidendi
Applicants established a prima facie case as the 1st and 4th Administrators, despite a valid consent order and unchallenged surveyor's sketch, have interfered with the 2nd house's allocated 366 acres. The court has jurisdiction to grant injunctive relief to preserve the estate and prevent irreparable harm, and the balance of convenience favours maintaining the status quo until final determination.
Court Disposition
Applications allowed
Orders
- Temporary injunction issued restraining the 1st and 4th Administrators, their agents, and any member of the 1st house from interfering with the 2nd house's use, possession, and occupation of 366 acres on the western side of L.R. No. 7439 (Sigowo) as per the surveyor's sketch presented in October 2024.
- No impediment remains to implementation of the County Land Surveyor's sketch map/plan.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment