[2023] KEHC 655 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 655 (KLR)

The court found that the circumstances of the applicant's case were similar to those in previous cases where repatriation was ordered for foreign nationals convicted of offences in Kenya. The state conceded to the application, and the court was persuaded to exercise its revisionary powers under section 362 of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 655 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ali Abdullahi Adow; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E008 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence and Repatriation
Outcome
application allowed; sentence revised; applicant to be repatriated
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Sentencing Revision, Immigration Offences, Repatriation Orders
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Revision Immigration Offences Repatriation Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ali Abdullahi Adow

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence and Repatriation

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed by the lower court was harsh and excessive in the circumstances.
  2. 2 Whether the court should exercise its revisionary powers to set aside the sentence and order repatriation of the applicant to Somalia.
  3. 3 Whether the sentences should have been ordered to run concurrently or consecutively.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the circumstances of the applicant's case were similar to those in previous cases where repatriation was ordered for foreign nationals convicted of offences in Kenya. The state conceded to the application, and the court was persuaded to exercise its revisionary powers under section 362 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The sentences imposed by the trial magistrate were set aside and substituted with an order commuting the sentence to the period already served. The applicant was ordered to be set free and repatriated to Somalia, as this was deemed just and appropriate in the circumstances.

Court Disposition

application allowed; sentence revised; applicant to be repatriated

Orders

  • The sentences imposed by the trial magistrate are set aside and substituted with an order commuting the sentence to the period already served.
  • The applicant is to be set free forthwith.