[2018] KEELC 556 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 556 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiffs' application for an interlocutory injunction was sub-judice, as the same parties and subject matter had already been litigated in ELC No. 233 of 2014 and Machakos CMCC No. 354 of 2013, where the plaintiffs' claims were dismissed and the defendants' rights to the property upheld....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 556 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Africa Inland Church Kenya Trustees Registered; Applicant: Bishop Rev. Bernard Nguyo; Respondent: The Chief Land Registrar; Respondent: The County Land Registrar, Machakos; Respondent: Shadrack Sila; Respondent: Bernard Wambua; Respondent: Aron Mutundu
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 25 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
OA Angote
Legal Topics
Injunctive Relief, Sub Judice Principle, Land Registration, Abuse of Process
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Injunctive Relief Sub Judice Principle Land Registration Abuse of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Africa Inland Church Kenya Trustees Registered

Applicant

Bishop Rev. Bernard Nguyo

Applicant

The Chief Land Registrar

Respondent

The County Land Registrar, Machakos

Respondent

Shadrack Sila

Respondent

Bernard Wambua

Respondent

Aron Mutundu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Injunction Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to an interlocutory injunction restraining the defendants from dealing with parcel Mwala/Mathunthini/570.
  2. 2 Whether the present suit is sub-judice in light of previous litigation involving the same parties and subject matter.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiffs have locus standi to institute the current suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiffs' application for an interlocutory injunction was sub-judice, as the same parties and subject matter had already been litigated in ELC No. 233 of 2014 and Machakos CMCC No. 354 of 2013, where the plaintiffs' claims were dismissed and the defendants' rights to the property upheld. The plaintiffs had not appealed those decisions. The court held that it would be a mockery of justice to grant relief previously denied and that the plaintiffs were abusing the process by filing repetitive suits. Furthermore, the land was registered in the name of A.I.C Mathunthini L.C.C, and until such registration is cancelled, the registered proprietor is entitled to...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 7th February, 2018 is dismissed with costs to the respondents.