[2012] KEHC 5744 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 5744 (KLR)

The court determined that it would be improper to proceed with the petition while the judges who are the subject of the determination have not yet exhausted their right of review as provided under the Vetting of Judges and Magistrates Act. The court therefore stayed the petition until the review process is completed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] KEHC 5744 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: African Centre for International Youth Exchange (ACIYE); Applicant: John Abok Garang; Applicant: Caleb Okech; Respondent: The Judges and Magistrates' Vetting Board
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 326 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Petition stayed pending exhaustion of right of review by the judges.
Judges
DAS Majanja
Legal Topics
Judicial Vetting, Right to Fair Hearing, Discrimination, Conservatory Orders
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Judicial Vetting Right to Fair Hearing Discrimination Conservatory Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

African Centre for International Youth Exchange (ACIYE)

Applicant

John Abok Garang

Applicant

Caleb Okech

Applicant

The Judges and Magistrates' Vetting Board

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the operation of section 22(2) of the Vetting of Judges and Magistrates Act should be stayed pending hearing.
  2. 2 Whether Justices Mohamed Ibrahim and Lady Justice Nambuye have been subjected to discriminatory and differential treatment.
  3. 3 Whether the petition should proceed before the judges' right of review is exhausted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that it would be improper to proceed with the petition while the judges who are the subject of the determination have not yet exhausted their right of review as provided under the Vetting of Judges and Magistrates Act. The court therefore stayed the petition until the review process is completed and a decision is delivered by the Board. The court also drew attention to the precedent upholding the constitutionality of the Vetting of Judges and Magistrates Act, reinforcing the need to respect the statutory process before judicial intervention.

Court Disposition

Petition stayed pending exhaustion of right of review by the judges.

Orders

  • The petition is stayed until the judges' right of review is exhausted by delivery of a decision by the Board.