[2011] KECA 11 (KLR)

[2011] KECA 11 (KLR)

The absence of clear procedural rules governing appeals from the Industrial Court to the Court of Appeal created genuine confusion as to where the notice of appeal should be filed. The applicant's attempt to file the notice within time, coupled with the lack of guidance from the registries, constituted a plausible...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2011] KECA 11 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: African Safari Club Limited; Respondent: Transport & Allied Workers Union
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 53 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals From Industrial Court, Court of Appeal Rules, Jurisdiction of Court of Appeal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Employment and Labour Extension of Time Appeals From Industrial Court Court of Appeal Rules Jurisdiction of Court of Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

African Safari Club Limited

Applicant

Transport & Allied Workers Union

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Extension of Time Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to extend time for filing a notice of appeal from the Industrial Court in the absence of specific rules.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has provided a plausible explanation for the delay in filing the notice of appeal.
  3. 3 Whether the absence of clear procedural rules should prejudice an intending appellant.

Ratio Decidendi

The absence of clear procedural rules governing appeals from the Industrial Court to the Court of Appeal created genuine confusion as to where the notice of appeal should be filed. The applicant's attempt to file the notice within time, coupled with the lack of guidance from the registries, constituted a plausible and reasonable explanation for the delay. The Court of Appeal has jurisdiction under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules to extend time for filing a notice of appeal from the Industrial Court, as the Industrial Court is now recognized as a superior court under the Constitution. The court further held that it is not improper for an advocate to delegate the filing of documents to...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • Time to lodge and serve a notice of appeal extended by 10 days from the date of the ruling.
  • Time to lodge and serve a memorandum and record of appeal extended by a further 30 days.