[2022] KEHC 11118 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 11118 (KLR)

The court found no reason to interfere with the sentence imposed on the applicant, who was convicted on his own plea of guilty for destroying cultivated produce. The applicant declined to be interviewed and did not provide any grounds for revision. The sentence of a fine of Ksh 200,000 or, in default, three years...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 11118 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Richard Agaki; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E015 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Outcome
Application for revision dismissed. Sentence left undisturbed.
Judges
JN Kamau
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Plea of Guilty, Destruction of Property
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Plea of Guilty Destruction of Property

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard Agaki

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the applicant upon conviction for destroying cultivated produce should be revised.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found no reason to interfere with the sentence imposed on the applicant, who was convicted on his own plea of guilty for destroying cultivated produce. The applicant declined to be interviewed and did not provide any grounds for revision. The sentence of a fine of Ksh 200,000 or, in default, three years imprisonment, was within the law and not manifestly excessive or illegal. Therefore, the court left the sentence undisturbed.

Court Disposition

Application for revision dismissed. Sentence left undisturbed.

Orders

  • The sentence imposed on the applicant is left undisturbed.
  • No further orders are made.