[2018] KEHC 2729 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 2729 (KLR)

The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to review or revise the sentence in the absence of a constitutional petition alleging violation of rights. The application was found to be a disguised appeal against a decision of a court of concurrent jurisdiction, which is impermissible. Furthermore, the court found that...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 2729 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Aggrey Ondego Adie; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 14 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Revision
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Revision of Sentence, Jurisdiction of High Court, Fundamental Rights Review
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Revision of Sentence Jurisdiction of High Court Fundamental Rights Review

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Aggrey Ondego Adie

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Revision

  1. 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to review or revise a sentence where no constitutional petition for violation of rights is before it.
  2. 2 Whether serving a lawful sentence constitutes a violation of fundamental rights and freedoms.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to review or revise the sentence in the absence of a constitutional petition alleging violation of rights. The application was found to be a disguised appeal against a decision of a court of concurrent jurisdiction, which is impermissible. Furthermore, the court found that serving a lawful sentence does not constitute a violation of fundamental rights and freedoms. Consequently, the application for revision was dismissed and the applicant was ordered to complete his sentence.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for review of sentence is dismissed.
  • The convict to complete the lawful sentence meted out on him in prison custody.