[2009] KEHC 675 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner had established, on a balance of probabilities, that the respondent had persistently deserted the matrimonial home for over two decades without justification or condonation. The absence of any rebuttal or defence from the respondent further strengthened the petitioner's case. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 675 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: A.G.K; Respondent: P.M.G
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 10 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition allowed; marriage dissolved; custody of M.W granted to petitioner; costs awarded to petitioner.
- Judges
- CN Mugo
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Custody of Disabled Child, Matrimonial Breakdown
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A.G.K
Petitioner
P.M.G
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage between the petitioner and respondent has irretrievably broken down due to desertion.
- 2 Whether the petitioner should be granted custody of the handicapped child, M.W.
- 3 Whether the petitioner is entitled to costs of the petition.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner had established, on a balance of probabilities, that the respondent had persistently deserted the matrimonial home for over two decades without justification or condonation. The absence of any rebuttal or defence from the respondent further strengthened the petitioner's case. The court concluded that the marriage had irretrievably broken down and that it was in the best interests of the handicapped child, M.W, for custody to be granted to the petitioner, who had demonstrated ongoing care and responsibility. The petitioner was also entitled to costs, as the petition was unopposed and the grounds were clearly established.
Court Disposition
Petition allowed; marriage dissolved; custody of M.W granted to petitioner; costs awarded to petitioner.
Orders
- The marriage between the petitioner and respondent is dissolved.
- Custody of M.W is granted to the petitioner.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
14 paragraphs
A.G.K…………………………..……………….PETITIONER
VERSUS
P.M.G……………………………….……………RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
The petitioner herein filed this petition on 18th July 2008, seeking to have his marriage between himself and the respondent dissolved, on the ground that the same has irretrievably broken down as a consequence of the respondent's desertion. He prays that he be granted the custody of one issue of the marriage, M.W who is handicapped and permanently confined to a wheelchair. Costs of the petition are also sought.
The respondent filed an Answer to Petition and Cross-Petition dated 4th August 2008 but which she later withdrew by way of a letter filed in this court dated 22nd January 2009. The petition therefore proceeded ex-parte as though undefended.
The petitioner, who testified orally in court, told this court that his marriage to the respondent was entered into in 1979 under the Kikuyu Customary Law. The couple was blessed with three children, all of whom are now adults. Save for M.W who is blind and disabled the two sons of the union, H.K and P.M are independent and live on their own.
It was the petitioner's evidence that the respondent has persistently deserted the matrimonial home for the last 26 years of the union, leaving the petitioner to care for the children. She gave no reasons for the desertions and the petitioner neither caused nor condoned the same. He recounted incidents of such desertions in 1983, 1985, 2007 and at the present time when she is said to have taken M with her, only to leave her under the care of a relative. The petitioner would wish to have custody of M given to him so that he can take care of her.
As earlier stated, the petition and the grounds thereof have not been challenged. There has been no rebuttal of the petitioner's evidence which clearly means that the petitioner has established the grounds for the dissolution of the marriage which, in view of the facts, has no doubt broken down irretrievably.
In the premises I hereby allow the petition and grant custody of M. W to the petitioner. I also award costs of the petition to the petitioner with interest at court rates.
A decree nisi to issue.
Dated signed and delivered at Nakuru this 16th day of November 2009
M. G. MUGO
JUDGE