[2014] KEELRC 527 (KLR)

[2014] KEELRC 527 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants' claim, being a labour claim founded on contract and arising before the Employment Act, 2007, is governed by the Limitation of Actions Act, Cap 22, which imposes a six-year limitation period. The applicants failed to demonstrate when, where, and how the cause of action arose, and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEELRC 527 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Agnes M. Osiemo and 75 Others; Respondent: National Bank of Kenya; Respondent: Industrial & Commercial Development Corporation
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 7 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Limitation of Actions, Extension of Time, Terminal Benefits, Jurisdiction of Court, Advocate Negligence
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Civil Procedure Limitation of Actions Extension of Time Terminal Benefits Jurisdiction of Court Advocate Negligence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Agnes M. Osiemo and 75 Others

Applicant

National Bank of Kenya

Respondent

Industrial & Commercial Development Corporation

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to extension of time to file a suit before the Industrial Court out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the Industrial Court has jurisdiction over the intended suit given the parties and facts presented.
  3. 3 Whether the applicants' claim is statute-barred under the Limitation of Actions Act, Cap 22.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants' claim, being a labour claim founded on contract and arising before the Employment Act, 2007, is governed by the Limitation of Actions Act, Cap 22, which imposes a six-year limitation period. The applicants failed to demonstrate when, where, and how the cause of action arose, and did not annex a draft statement of claim for the court's evaluation. The respondents were not shown to be the applicants' employers, and there was insufficient material to establish the court's jurisdiction. The court held that negligence by the applicants' previous advocate does not provide grounds for extension of time beyond the statutory limitation period. As such, the...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The exparte application for extension of time to file suit is dismissed.