[2021] KEELRC 667 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 667 (KLR)

The court found that there were no subsisting stay orders preventing the enforcement of its judgement of 13th May 2010, which ordered the unconditional reinstatement and re-engagement of the claimants without loss of pay or seniority. The respondent's obligations under the award remain enforceable, and the only...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 667 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Agnes Muthoni & 34 Others; Respondent: Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI); Interested Party: Union of National Research and Allied Institutes Staff of Kenya (UNRISK)
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 37(N) of 2010
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Post Judgment Enforcement Application
Outcome
application allowed in part
Judges
M Mbarũ
Legal Topics
Reinstatement of Employees, Unfair Termination, Back Pay, Court Orders Enforcement
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Reinstatement of Employees Unfair Termination Back Pay Court Orders Enforcement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Agnes Muthoni & 34 Others

Applicant

Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)

Respondent

Union of National Research and Allied Institutes Staff of Kenya (UNRISK)

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Post Judgment Enforcement Application

  1. 1 Whether the respondent should be compelled to reinstate and re-engage the claimants as per the court's award of 13th May 2010.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent is obligated to pay the claimants back pay, salaries, and allowances as tabulated by the claimants.
  3. 3 Whether the sums deposited as security should be released to the claimants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there were no subsisting stay orders preventing the enforcement of its judgement of 13th May 2010, which ordered the unconditional reinstatement and re-engagement of the claimants without loss of pay or seniority. The respondent's obligations under the award remain enforceable, and the only secured payments were those specifically ordered by the court. The claimants are entitled to reinstatement and payment of basic salary from 17th June 2015 to date, but not to allowances and emoluments not included in the original award. The security deposit and accrued interest must be released to the claimants. The application was allowed except for claims not forming part of the...

Court Disposition

application allowed in part

Orders

  • The respondent's Chief Executive Officer and Director is ordered to re-engage the claimants and allow them to resume work without loss of status as of 17th December 2009.
  • The claimants shall report for duty before the Chief Executive Officer and Director on 18th October 2021 at 8:30 AM for deployment.