[2025] KEHC 7296 (KLR)
The court found that the transfer of the suit from Maseno Law Courts to Kombewa Law Courts was justified to promote access to justice and convenience for the parties. The High Court exercised its jurisdiction under section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act, noting that there was no objection from the respondents and no...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 7296 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Cynthia Agneta Agunda; Respondent: Kenya Kazi Services Limited; Respondent: Protus Nzomo
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Miscellaneous Application 31 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Transfer of Suit
- Outcome
- Application for transfer of suit allowed.
- Judges
- A Mabeya
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Suit, Jurisdiction of Courts, Access to Justice
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cynthia Agneta Agunda
Applicant
Kenya Kazi Services Limited
Respondent
Protus Nzomo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Transfer of Suit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court should transfer the suit from Maseno Law Courts to Kombewa Law Courts for hearing and determination.
- 2 Whether the transfer is necessary to promote access to justice under Article 48 of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the transfer of the suit from Maseno Law Courts to Kombewa Law Courts was justified to promote access to justice and convenience for the parties. The High Court exercised its jurisdiction under section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act, noting that there was no objection from the respondents and no evidence of prejudice. The transfer would facilitate the expeditious and fair determination of the matter in a court with proper geographical jurisdiction. The court emphasized the constitutional imperative of access to justice under Article 48, holding that procedural technicalities should not hinder the substantive rights of the parties. Accordingly, the file was withdrawn...
Court Disposition
Application for transfer of suit allowed.
Orders
- The file is withdrawn from Maseno Law Courts and transferred to Kombewa Law Courts for hearing and determination.
- Mention on 9/6/2025 before the Head of Station, Kombewa Law Court for further directions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Agunda v Kenya Kazi Services Limited & another (Civil Miscellaneous Application 31 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 7296 (KLR) (3 June 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 7296 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Civil Miscellaneous Application 31 of 2025
A Mabeya, J
June 3, 2025
Between
Cynthia Agneta Agunda
Plaintiff
and
Kenya Kazi Services Limited
1st Defendant
Protus Nzomo
2nd Defendant
(From Original Maseno Senior Principal Magistrate Civil Case No. E046 of 2024)
Ruling
1. I have considered the geographical jurisdiction of the Magistrate’s Courts of Maseno and Kombewa. In accordance with the principle of access to justice under Article 48 of the Constitution of Kenya, I hereby exercise the jurisdiction of this Court under section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act and hereby have this file withdrawn from Maseno Law Courts and transferred to Kombewa Law Courts for hearing and determination.
2. Mention on 9/6/2025 before the Head of Station, Kombewa Law Court for further directions.
3. This file is marked as closed.It is so ordered.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025. A. MABEYA, FCI, ArbJUDGE