[2000] KECA 231 (KLR)
The Court held that the order included in the record of appeal was incurably defective because it contained an order relating to a different ruling not subject to the present appeal and included an amendment whose origin could not be ascertained. The attempt to cure the defect by way of a supplementary affidavit was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2000] KECA 231 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: A.H. Lalji; Respondent: B.H. Lalji; Respondent: D.H. Nurani; Respondent: Samvir Management Services Limited; Respondent: Atta (Kenya) Limited
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 52 of 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- appeal struck out as incompetent
- Judges
- E Owuor
- Legal Topics
- Defective Record of Appeal, Amendment of Court Orders, Supplementary Affidavit, Competence of Appeal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A.H. Lalji
Appellant
B.H. Lalji
Respondent
D.H. Nurani
Respondent
Samvir Management Services Limited
Respondent
Atta (Kenya) Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a defective primary document in the record of appeal can be amended or regularized by a supplementary affidavit.
- 2 Whether the inclusion of an order relating to a different ruling renders the appeal incompetent.
- 3 Whether the authenticity of an amendment to a court order must be established for the order to be valid.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the order included in the record of appeal was incurably defective because it contained an order relating to a different ruling not subject to the present appeal and included an amendment whose origin could not be ascertained. The attempt to cure the defect by way of a supplementary affidavit was impermissible according to established Court of Appeal authorities. The lack of evidence as to who effected the amendment and at what stage rendered the authenticity of the amendment questionable. Consequently, the defect in the record of appeal was fatal and rendered the entire appeal incompetent.
Court Disposition
appeal struck out as incompetent
Orders
- The appeal is struck out as incompetent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAIROBI
civ app 52 of 99
A.H. LALJI ........................................APPELLANT
AND
B.H. LALJI .................................... 1ST RESPONDENT
D.H. NURANI ................................... 2ND RESPONDENT
SAMVIR MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED ............. 3RD RESPONDENT
ATTA (KENYA) LIMITED ........................... 4TH RESPONDENT
RULING OF OWUOR, J.A
I have had the advantage of reading and considering in draft the rulings of GICHERU and SHAH, JJ.A. I have no doubt in my mind and based on the numerous recent authorities of this Court; see Trimborn Agricultural Engineering Limited vs David Njoroge Kabaiko and Kenya Shield Security Limited Civil Appeal (Application) No. 274 of 1998, and Pepco Construction Company Limited vs Carter & Sons Limited Civil Appeal (Application) No. 80 of 1999, that a defective primary document, which the order filed herein is, cannot be amended or brought on record by way of a supplementary affidavit. In that regard it renders the whole appeal incompetent.
The order complained of contains an order that is in respect of another ruling that is not subject matter of the present appeal. Furthermore it contains an amendment whose origin is not ascertainable. Jowits Dictionary of English Law defines an amendment as:- "the correction of some error or omission or the curing of some defect in judicial proceedings".
In a case like this one where it is in dispute as to who effected the amendment and at what stage of the proceedings, there has to be some evidence as to the authenticity of the amendment. I would find merit in Mr. Oduol's objection to the order in the record of appeal and hold that the same is incurably defective, thereby rendering the appeal incompetent.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 7th day of April, 2000.
E. OWUOR
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR