[2023] KEELRC 502 (KLR)
The court held that the administration of justice must be orderly and that rulings prepared and signed by the court must be delivered to the parties and placed on the record as scheduled, even if parties indicate withdrawal of petitions or instructions to advocates on the date of delivery. The court emphasized that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEELRC 502 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Abdullahi Mohammed Ahmed; Applicant: Ibrahim Daud Bare; Applicant: Mohammed Abdi Adan; Applicant: Abdirahman Adan Hussein; Respondent: Governor, Mandera County Government; Respondent: Mandera County Government; Respondent: Clerk of the County Assembly, Mandera County; Respondent: Speaker of the County Assembly, Mandera County; Respondent: County Assembly Committee of Appointment, Mandera County; Respondent: Mandera County Public Service Board; Interested Party: Rahma Said Elias; Interested Party: Abdifatah Ibrahim Ogle; Interested Party: Mohamud Mohamed Ali; Interested Party: Muktar Issack Kassim; Interested Party: Yussuf Mohamed Kala; Interested Party: Hussein Yussuf Sheikh; Interested Party: Mohamed Khalif Adan; Interested Party: Zeitun Abdishakur Abdikarim; Interested Party: Hussein Abdirahman Sheikh; Interested Party: Adan Abdirahman Mohamed; Interested Party: Ibrahim Mohamed Ali; Interested Party: Abdikadir Mohamed Tache; Interested Party: Ibrahim Issack Nurow; Interested Party: Fartun Bulle Ibrahim; Interested Party: Kassim Yussuf Hassan; Interested Party: Halima Hassan Ali; Interested Party: Dr. Abdikadir Adan Alio; Interested Party: Hamdi Ahmed Mohamed; Interested Party: Farhiya Ali Abdullahi; Interested Party: Fatuma Abdi Hussein; Interested Party: Fatuma Mohamed Tiko; Interested Party: Adow Ibrahim Mohamed; Interested Party: Abukar Abdi Sheikh; Interested Party: Ahmed Abdullahi Aden; Interested Party: Abdulaziz Barre Hassan; Interested Party: Sahara Adow Aden; Interested Party: Ismail Omar Ibrahim; Interested Party: Zulenka Osman Maalim; Interested Party: Adan Maalim Abdullahi; Interested Party: Muad Mohamed Khalif; Interested Party: Mohamed Shukri Abdikar; Interested Party: Abdiwalhab Mohamed Issack; Interested Party: Miski Hassan Abdi
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition E199 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Conservatory Orders and Withdrawal of Petitions
- Outcome
- Ruling delivered as scheduled; parties to move for withdrawal orders thereafter.
- Judges
- J Rika
- Legal Topics
- Conservatory Orders, Withdrawal of Petition, Court Administration, Procedure on Withdrawal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abdullahi Mohammed Ahmed
Applicant
Ibrahim Daud Bare
Applicant
Mohammed Abdi Adan
Applicant
Abdirahman Adan Hussein
Applicant
Governor, Mandera County Government
Respondent
Mandera County Government
Respondent
Clerk of the County Assembly, Mandera County
Respondent
Speaker of the County Assembly, Mandera County
Respondent
County Assembly Committee of Appointment, Mandera County
Respondent
Mandera County Public Service Board
Respondent
Rahma Said Elias
Interested Party
Abdifatah Ibrahim Ogle
Interested Party
Mohamud Mohamed Ali
Interested Party
Muktar Issack Kassim
Interested Party
Yussuf Mohamed Kala
Interested Party
Hussein Yussuf Sheikh
Interested Party
Mohamed Khalif Adan
Interested Party
Zeitun Abdishakur Abdikarim
Interested Party
Hussein Abdirahman Sheikh
Interested Party
Adan Abdirahman Mohamed
Interested Party
Ibrahim Mohamed Ali
Interested Party
Abdikadir Mohamed Tache
Interested Party
Ibrahim Issack Nurow
Interested Party
Fartun Bulle Ibrahim
Interested Party
Kassim Yussuf Hassan
Interested Party
Halima Hassan Ali
Interested Party
Dr. Abdikadir Adan Alio
Interested Party
Hamdi Ahmed Mohamed
Interested Party
Farhiya Ali Abdullahi
Interested Party
Fatuma Abdi Hussein
Interested Party
Fatuma Mohamed Tiko
Interested Party
Adow Ibrahim Mohamed
Interested Party
Abukar Abdi Sheikh
Interested Party
Ahmed Abdullahi Aden
Interested Party
Abdulaziz Barre Hassan
Interested Party
Sahara Adow Aden
Interested Party
Ismail Omar Ibrahim
Interested Party
Zulenka Osman Maalim
Interested Party
Adan Maalim Abdullahi
Interested Party
Muad Mohamed Khalif
Interested Party
Mohamed Shukri Abdikar
Interested Party
Abdiwalhab Mohamed Issack
Interested Party
Miski Hassan Abdi
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Conservatory Orders and Withdrawal of Petitions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should deliver a prepared ruling when parties indicate withdrawal of petitions on the date of delivery.
- 2 Whether withdrawal of petitions and advocates' instructions is effective without court endorsement.
- 3 What is the proper procedure for withdrawal of petitions and advocates' instructions after a ruling is ready.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the administration of justice must be orderly and that rulings prepared and signed by the court must be delivered to the parties and placed on the record as scheduled, even if parties indicate withdrawal of petitions or instructions to advocates on the date of delivery. The court emphasized that such withdrawals are not effective until formally endorsed by the court. Therefore, the ruling was released as scheduled, and parties were directed to move the court for formal orders of withdrawal thereafter. This approach ensures transparency, proper record-keeping, and adherence to procedural fairness, preventing parties from circumventing the judicial process by informal...
Court Disposition
Ruling delivered as scheduled; parties to move for withdrawal orders thereafter.
Orders
- The ruling dated February 28, 2023 shall be released to the parties and placed on the record as earlier scheduled.
- Thereafter, parties shall move the court for further orders withdrawing the petitions and withdrawing instructions from any advocate on record.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
105 paragraphs
Ahmed & 3 others v Governor, Mandera County Government & 5 others; Elias & 32 others (Interested Parties) (Petition E199 & E203 of 2022 (Consolidated)) [2023] KEELRC 502 (KLR) (28 February 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEELRC 502 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Petition E199 & E203 of 2022 (Consolidated)
J Rika, J
February 28, 2023
Between
Abdullahi Mohammed Ahmed
1st Petitioner
Ibrahim Daud Bare
2nd Petitioner
Mohammed Abdi Adan
3rd Petitioner
Abdirahman Adan Hussein
4th Petitioner
and
Governor, Mandera County Government
1st Respondent
Mandera County Government
2nd Respondent
Clerk of the County Assembly, Mandera County
3rd Respondent
Speaker of the County Assembly, Mandera County
4th Respondent
County Assembly Committee of Appointment, Mandera County
5th Respondent
Mandera County Public Service Board
6th Respondent
and
Rahma Said Elias
Interested Party
Abdifatah Ibrahim Ogle
Interested Party
Mohamud Mohamed Ali
Interested Party
Muktar Issack Kassim
Interested Party
Yussuf Mohamed Kala
Interested Party
Hussein Yussuf Sheikh
Interested Party
Mohamed Khalif Adan
Interested Party
Zeitun Abdishakur Abdikarim
Interested Party
Hussein Abdirahman Sheikh
Interested Party
Adan Abdirahman Mohamed
Interested Party
Ibrahim Mohamed Ali
Interested Party
Abdikadir Mohamed Tache
Interested Party
Ibrahim Issack Nurow
Interested Party
Fartun Bulle Ibrahim
Interested Party
Kassim Yussuf Hassan
Interested Party
Halima Hassan Ali
Interested Party
Dr. Abdikadir Adan Alio
Interested Party
Hamdi Ahmed Mohamed
Interested Party
Farhiya Ali Abdullahi
Interested Party
Fatuma Abdi Hussein
Interested Party
Fatuma Mohamed Tiko
Interested Party
Adow Ibrahim Mohamed
Interested Party
Abukar Abdi Sheikh
Interested Party
Ahmed Abdullahi Aden
Interested Party
Abdulaziz Barre Hassan
Interested Party
Sahara Adow Aden
Interested Party
Ismail Omar Ibrahim
Interested Party
Zulenka Osman Maalim
Interested Party
Adan Maalim Abdullahi
Interested Party
Muad Mohamed Khalif
Interested Party
Mohamed Shukri Abdikar
Interested Party
Abdiwalhab Mohamed Issack
Interested Party
Miski Hassan Abdi
Interested Party
Ruling
1. There were 3 petitions filed by different parties initially. These are- Petition E199, E202 and E203 all of 2022. The petitions were consolidated.
2. A conservatory order issued in E199, was adopted in the consolidated petitions. At the last mention on January 27, 2022, petition E202 of 2022 was withdrawn. The court scheduled its ruling on the conservatory orders in the remaining petitions –E199 and 203 – for today.
3. The ruling is ready, signed and available from court No 6. The respondents and the petitioner in petition No 199 of 2022, indicate on the date the petitions are due for the ruling, that the petitions have been withdrawn. The 1st petitioner indicates that he has withdrawn instructions from his advocate.
4. Orderly administration of justice requires that the ruling is delivered to the parties as scheduled. Orders of withdrawal of the petitions have not been endorsed by the court, neither has the notice of withdrawal of advocates.
5. The ruling shall therefore be released to the parties as scheduled. Having received the ruling, parties shall be at liberty to seek withdrawal of the petitions, and withdrawal of instructions from their counsel.
6. Administration of justice must be orderly and rulings prepared and signed by the court, must be released to the parties and placed on the record.
7. It is ordered;a.The ruling dated February 28, 2023 shall be released to the parties and placed on the record as earlier scheduled.b.Thereafter, parties shall move the court for further orders withdrawing the petitions and withdrawing instructions from any advocate on record.c.Mention on March 7, 2023.
DATED, SIGNED AND RELEASED TO THE PARTIES ELECTRONICALLY, AT NAIROBI, THIS 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023. JAMES RIKAJUDGE