[2004] KEHC 1960 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff was employed by the defendant and was injured while acting in the course of his employment due to the negligent driving of the defendant's employee. The evidence, including the police abstract, P3 form, and medical reports, established the occurrence of the accident, the nature and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] KEHC 1960 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ahmed Mohammed; Defendant: Abdulhafidh Mohamed Banragah
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 319 of 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Road Traffic Accidents, Employer Liability, Negligence, Personal Injury, Damages Assessment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ahmed Mohammed
Plaintiff
Abdulhafidh Mohamed Banragah
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant is liable for the injuries sustained by the plaintiff in the road traffic accident.
- 2 Whether the driver of the defendant's vehicle was negligent.
- 3 What quantum of damages, both special and general, is payable to the plaintiff.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff was employed by the defendant and was injured while acting in the course of his employment due to the negligent driving of the defendant's employee. The evidence, including the police abstract, P3 form, and medical reports, established the occurrence of the accident, the nature and extent of the injuries, and the need for prolonged medical treatment. The defendant did not contest liability or present any evidence. The court accepted the plaintiff's claim for special damages as supported by the documentary evidence and awarded general damages for pain, suffering, and loss of amenities, considering the severity of the injuries, the number of operations,...
Court Disposition
judgment for the plaintiff
Orders
- Judgment entered against the defendant for Kshs. 752,100 with costs and interest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA
CIVIL SUIT NO.319 RD OF 2001
AHMED MOHAMMED…………………………………….PLAINTIFF
=V E R S U S=
ABDULHAFIDH MOHAMED BANRAGAH…………DEFENDANT
J U D G M E N T
The Plaintiff claims damages, special and general arising out of a road traffic accident.
The Plaintiff was employed by the Defendant as a turnboy in the Defendant’s vehicle No.ZB4033, KAE 501 which on 11/8/1999 was traveling along Mombasa/Nairobi road. The Plaintiff states that the driver of the vehicle employed by the Defendant drove the vehicle so negligently that he caused it to overturn and the Plaintiff suffered injuries.
The matter came up for formal proof on 22/4/2004 when the Plaintiff gave evidence. He testified that he was traveling in the vehicle in the cause of his employment and was sitting infront with the driver. The vehicle went off that road into the forest and he did not know what happened. When he came to he found himself in a hospital in Nairobi West. He was transferred to another hospital where he was treated.
He reported to police and collected Police Abstract from Machakos Police Station. At the trial he did exhibit the Police Abstract as Exhibit 3 and P3 Form as Exhibit 4. He also produced Medical Report. He stated that the driver was negligent and that he was driving fast.
No submissions were tendered and no authorities were cited. The Exhibit (1) from Coast General Hospital shows that the Plaintiff sustained fracture left femur subtrocharteric and communited compound fracture left tibia and fibula and that was treated by external fixation of Tibiofibula and was put on skeletal traction. He was treated for the crushed left tibia leaving a gap. He required skin and bone grafting of left tibia.This report was made on 26. 10. 99. On 21/5/2001 the Plaintiff was examined by Dr. Patrice M.L. Odede. The Medical Report is Exhibit 5 confirmed the injuries and treatment at Nairobi West, Coast General Hospital and Garisa District Hospital.
He was operated on 3 times and admitted to hospital for 9 months. There is mal-union of fracture of femur. There is shortening of the left lower limb the tibia fibula facture had not healed then. There will be osteoarthritis of left lower limb joints. There may be further operation to correct mal-union.Plaintiff would not be able to walk otherwise without crutches.
Special damages is Police Abstract fees Kshs.100/- which is the prescribed fees. Also kshs.2,000/- medical fee. No receipt for payment is exhibited but the claim is strengthened by Medical Report exhibited. Both items are allowed.
On the issue of damages for pain and suffering, I have taken into account that the Plaintiff underwent 3 operations and was left with scars. He was in hospital for 9 months and was walking in crutches for a long time. Also that there is need for a further operation to remove the ‘K’ Nail.
In the circumstances, I find a sum of Kshs.750,000/- adequate compensation for pain and suffering and loss of amenities.
Therefore judgment is entered against the Defendant in
the sum of kshs.752,100/- with costs and interest.
Dated this 30th day of July, 2004.
JOYCE KHAMINWA
J U D G E
Read on 30/7/04 in presence of:-
Mr. Mologo
Mr. Abeid