[2021] KEHC 8460 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 8460 (KLR)

The court found that, following the parties' inability to agree on an arbitrator as required by the arbitration clause, judicial intervention was necessary to prevent undue delay and ensure the dispute resolution process continued. After evaluating the credentials of both proposed arbitrators, the court determined...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 8460 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Ainushamsi Construction & Transport Limited & 55 Others; Defendant: The County Government of Garissa; Defendant: The Governor, County Government of Garissa; Defendant: The CECM for Finance and Economic Planning, Garissa County
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Garissa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 7 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Appointment of Arbitrator
Outcome
Application for appointment of arbitrator allowed; Dr. Kariuki Muigua appointed as arbitrator.
Judges
A Ali-Aroni
Legal Topics
Arbitration Agreement, Appointment of Arbitrator, Contractual Disputes
Source Language
en
Alternative Dispute Resolution Commercial and Corporate Arbitration Agreement Appointment of Arbitrator Contractual Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ainushamsi Construction & Transport Limited & 55 Others

Plaintiff

The County Government of Garissa

Defendant

The Governor, County Government of Garissa

Defendant

The CECM for Finance and Economic Planning, Garissa County

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Appointment of Arbitrator

  1. 1 Whether the court should appoint an arbitrator due to parties' failure to agree on one as per the arbitration clause.
  2. 2 Whether the proposed arbitrators meet the requisite qualifications for appointment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, following the parties' inability to agree on an arbitrator as required by the arbitration clause, judicial intervention was necessary to prevent undue delay and ensure the dispute resolution process continued. After evaluating the credentials of both proposed arbitrators, the court determined that Dr. Kariuki Muigua's extensive experience and qualifications in both domestic and international arbitration made him the most suitable candidate. The court therefore exercised its discretion to appoint Dr. Muigua as arbitrator, directed the parties to agree on issues for determination within 14 days, and ordered the arbitration to be concluded within 90 days, thereby...

Court Disposition

Application for appointment of arbitrator allowed; Dr. Kariuki Muigua appointed as arbitrator.

Orders

  • Dr. Kariuki Muigua is appointed as arbitrator to handle the outstanding issues.
  • Parties to agree on issues for determination by the arbitrator within 14 days from the date of the ruling.