[1999] KECA 128 (KLR)

[1999] KECA 128 (KLR)

The court accepted the consent of both parties to withdraw the application. In accordance with procedural law, the court marked the application as withdrawn and awarded costs to the applicant, as agreed by the parties. The order was made by the Court of Appeal at Nairobi and reflects the parties' mutual agreement,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1999] KECA 128 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Air France; Respondent: Rono Limited
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 240 of 1998
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Withdrawal by Consent
Outcome
Application withdrawn by consent with costs to the applicant.
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Application, Costs Award
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Withdrawal of Application Costs Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Air France

Applicant

Rono Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Withdrawal by Consent

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application should be withdrawn by consent of both parties.
  2. 2 Who should bear the costs of the withdrawn application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court accepted the consent of both parties to withdraw the application. In accordance with procedural law, the court marked the application as withdrawn and awarded costs to the applicant, as agreed by the parties. The order was made by the Court of Appeal at Nairobi and reflects the parties' mutual agreement, with the court formalizing the withdrawal and costs disposition.

Court Disposition

Application withdrawn by consent with costs to the applicant.

Orders

  • The application is marked as withdrawn by consent of both parties.
  • Costs awarded to the applicant.