[2019] KEELRC 1428 (KLR)
The court found that the employment contract between the parties required either party to give three months' notice before termination. The Respondent failed to provide such notice upon resignation, and the Claimant's evidence was uncontroverted due to the Respondent's absence at trial. The court calculated the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELRC 1428 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Air Kenya Express Limited; Respondent: Leonard Odhiambo
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 250 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; Respondent to pay Claimant three months' salary in lieu of notice less leave days, plus costs and interest. Counterclaim dismissed.
- Judges
- HS Wasilwa
- Legal Topics
- Summary Dismissal, Notice Periods, Breach of Employment Contract, Salary Entitlements
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Air Kenya Express Limited
Claimant
Leonard Odhiambo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent breached the employment contract by failing to give the requisite notice before resignation.
- 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to three months' salary in lieu of notice less leave days due.
- 3 Whether the Respondent is entitled to any counterclaim for unpaid salary or salary differentials.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the employment contract between the parties required either party to give three months' notice before termination. The Respondent failed to provide such notice upon resignation, and the Claimant's evidence was uncontroverted due to the Respondent's absence at trial. The court calculated the amount due as three months' salary in lieu of notice, less the value of 33 leave days acknowledged by the Claimant, resulting in a net award of KShs. 385,714, subject to statutory deductions. The Respondent's counterclaim was not supported by evidence and was dismissed. The Claimant was also awarded costs and interest at court rates from the date of judgment.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; Respondent to pay Claimant three months' salary in lieu of notice less leave days, plus costs and interest. Counterclaim dismissed.
Orders
- Respondent to pay Claimant KShs. 385,714 less statutory deductions as three months' salary in lieu of notice less 33 leave days.
- Respondent to pay costs of the suit to the Claimant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT NAIROBI
CAUSE 250 OF 2015
(Before Hon. Lady Justice Hellen S. Wasilwa on 28th May, 2019)
AIR KENYA EXPRESS LIMITED.........CLAIMANT
VERSUS
LEONARD ODHIAMBO...................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. The Claimant originally instituted a suit in the Chief Magistrate’s Court vide the Plaint dated 24th September 2008. However, the same was later transferred to this Court pursuant to the Order issued by the High Court on 3rd February 2014. The Claimant is suing the Respondent for breach of contract and seeks the following orders:-
a. Special damages in the sum of KShs. 385,714. 00 computed as follows:
30/21 x 270,000. 00 being 3 months’ salary in lieu of notice less 33 leave days due.
b. Interest on (a) above plus costs of this suit and interest until payment in full.
2. The Claimant avers that the Claimant summarily terminated their employment contract without the issuance of the requisite notice. As result, the Respondent occasioned loss and damages to the Claimant.
3. In her witness statement dated 9th February 2018, Joan Wanja Githinji testified that the Claimant and Respondent entered into an employment relationship vide the contract dated 17th September 2004. His contract was amended vide the Addendum dated 21st March 2005, where he was confirmed as an Airworthiness/Quality Auditor earning a salary of KShs. 130,000. 00. He was later promoted to a Quality Manager vide the contract dated 10th August 2006.
4. She further testifies that either the Claimant or Respondent had the obligation of issuing a 3 months’ notice, which the Respondent failed to issue to the Claimant before he resigned. It is also her testimony that at the time of breach, the Claimant was earning a salary of Kshs. 270,000. 00.
5. The Respondent vide his Defence and Counterclaim dated 5th November 2008, contended that he left his employment because the Claimant frustrated him and failed to pay his rightful dues. That on 21st February 2006 he was elevated to the post of corporate quality manager on the terms that there would be an upward review of his salary. However, the Claimant failed to honour the terms and he was forced to work at a salary not commensurate to his position. The Respondent prays that the Claimant’s suit be dismissed with costs and judgment be entered on the counter-claim as follows:-
a. Unpaid salary balance for the months of February and March 2008.
b. Differential salary on the level of corporate quality manager from 21st February 2006 to 30th June 2008.
c. Costs of the suit together with interest and any other further relief this Honourable Court may deem fit to grant.
6. The Claimant filed its rejoinder on 13th November 2008, denying the averments made in the Defence and Counterclaim and prayed for the same to be dismissed with costs and judgment entered as prayed in the plaint.
7. The cause proceeded ex parte after the Respondent failed to attend despite service of hearing notice to him. CW1, Joan Wanja Githinji, sought to adopt her sworn statement as her evidence in chief and to rely on the Bundle of Documents filed on 9th February 2018. Thereafter, the Claimant closed its case.
8. In the absence of the Respondent submitting any evidence before this Court, the Claimant’s case remained uncontroverted.
9. The main prayer by the Claimant is for payment of 3 months notice in lieu of notice as per the Clause 13 of the contract signed on 10/5/2006.
10. I do agree that this contract could only be terminated upon either Party giving 3 months’ notice, which the Respondent failed to do.
11. I therefore find for the Claimant and award 3 months’ salary as notice pay= 270,000 x 3 = 810,000 – less 33 days leave acknowledged by the Claimant = 33/21 x 270,000 = 424,286
TOTAL = 810,000 - 424,286 = 385,714
Less statutory deductions
12. The Respondent will also pay costs and interest at Court rates with effect from the date of this judgement.
Dated and delivered in open Court this 28th day of May, 2019.
HON. LADY JUSTICE HELLEN WASILWA
JUDGE
In the presence of:
No appearance for Parties