[2013] KEHC 6492 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 6492 (KLR)

The court found that the respondents are entitled to carry out their statutory mandate to protect the Tsavo National Parks and enforce the law, including removal of unauthorised livestock, apprehension of poachers, and recovery of illegal firearms. However, such operations must not infringe the constitutional...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 6492 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Al-Nas Company Limited; Applicant: Kuranze Group Ranch; Applicant: Abdi W. Bisle; Applicant: Hussein Jelle; Applicant: Mohamed Osman Maow; Applicant: Yusuf Abdi; Applicant: Fatuma Abdi; Respondent: The Hon. Attorney General; Respondent: The Inspector General of Police; Respondent: The Director, Kenya Wildlife Services
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 248,249,250,251,252, 253 & 299 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Post Interlocutory Settlement Directions
Outcome
Settlement agreement recorded and adopted as order of the court; matter set for mention for further directions.
Judges
DAS Majanja
Legal Topics
Property Rights, Wildlife Conservation, Law Enforcement Operations, Leasehold Rights, Ecosystem Protection, Illegal Firearms Control
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Land and Property Environmental Law Property Rights Wildlife Conservation Law Enforcement Operations Leasehold Rights Ecosystem Protection +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Al-Nas Company Limited

Applicant

Kuranze Group Ranch

Applicant

Abdi W. Bisle

Applicant

Hussein Jelle

Applicant

Mohamed Osman Maow

Applicant

Yusuf Abdi

Applicant

Fatuma Abdi

Applicant

The Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

The Inspector General of Police

Respondent

The Director, Kenya Wildlife Services

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Post Interlocutory Settlement Directions

  1. 1 Whether the respondents' planned operation in Tsavo National Parks infringes the petitioners' constitutional property rights.
  2. 2 Whether the petitioners, as ranchers with leases, are protected from eviction or removal of livestock under the law.
  3. 3 What obligations do the petitioners and respondents have to ensure lawful use and protection of the ecosystem.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondents are entitled to carry out their statutory mandate to protect the Tsavo National Parks and enforce the law, including removal of unauthorised livestock, apprehension of poachers, and recovery of illegal firearms. However, such operations must not infringe the constitutional property rights of the petitioners, who are ranchers with valid leases. The parties reached a settlement, endorsed by the court, that allows the respondents to proceed with their operation subject to safeguards: no removal of ranchers or livestock with valid leases, provision of employee lists for verification, cooperation in wildlife protection, and surrender of illegal firearms....

Court Disposition

Settlement agreement recorded and adopted as order of the court; matter set for mention for further directions.

Orders

  • The Police Service and KWS shall carry out their mandate in accordance with the agreed terms and within the law.
  • No removal of ranchers with valid leases or their livestock shall be undertaken.